期刊文献+

不同反馈方式对腹腔镜模拟培训教学的影响 被引量:3

Impact of different feedback methods on the education of laparoscopic simulation training
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨在持续两周的培训课程中,不同反馈方式对腹腔镜模拟培训学习者训练效果的影响。方法以2017年8月至2018年4月在新疆医科大学第一附属医院微创技能培训中心参加腹腔镜模拟培训的98名学员为研究对象,分为三组。Group 1(32人):训练过程中只观看视频教程,不接受指导教师反馈;Group 2(33人):训练过程中可全程观看视频教程,训练过程中指导教师随时进行反馈(即时性反馈);Group 3(33人):训练过程中可全程观看视频教程,每个项目训练结束后接受指导教师总结性反馈。比较培训前、后各组考核操作时间和考核评分的差异,以及培训后各组之间考核操作时间和考核评分的差异。采用STATA 11.0软件进行卡方检验和t检验。结果三组培训后的考核评分均高于培训前(P<0.05),考核操作时间均短于培训前(P<0.05)。培训后,考核操作时间Group 3高于其他两组(P<0.05);考核评分,Group 3高于其他两组(P<0.05);但其他两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。三组训练周期结束后所花费的训练时长及重复次数差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),Group 3达到合格水平所花费的训练时长及重复次数小于其他两组(P<0.05)。结论在腹腔镜模拟培训中,总结性反馈相较于其他两组能够很大程度上加快学习速度,提高训练效率。 Objective To investigate the impact of different feedback methods on the training effects of laparoscopic simulation training learners in two-week training course.Methods A total of 98 trainees receiving simulation laparoscopic training from August 2017 to April 2018 in The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University were randomized into three groups,including Group 1(n=32),watching video tutorials only;Group 2(n=33),watching video tutorials and receiving immediate feedback;Group 3(n=33)watching video tutorials and receiving conclusive feedback.All the trainees received assessment before and after the training.The differences of assessment scores and operation time before and after the training were compared among the three groups.Chi-square test and t test were conducted by STATA 11.0.Results The assessment scores of the three groups were significantly improved after the training than before(P<0.05),and the operation time of the three groups were significantly shorter than before(P<0.05).The assessment scores and operation time of Group 3 after the training were significantly better than the other two groups(P<0.05),and the assessment scores of Group 3 were higher than those of the other two groups(P<0.05),but there was no significant difference between the other two groups(P>0.05).There were significant differences in training duration and repetition times among the three groups(P<0.05).The training duration and repetition times of Group 3 were significantly less than those of the other two groups(P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with the other two groups,conclusive feedback can greatly accelerate learning and improve training efficiency in laparoscopic simulation training.
作者 陈少科 王静 马杰 王沁 周言 Chen Shaoke;Wang Jing;Ma Jie;Wang Qin;Zhou Yan(Clinical Skills Training Center,The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi 830054,China;Department of Gynecology,The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi 830054,China)
出处 《中华医学教育探索杂志》 2021年第5期514-517,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
基金 自治区自然科学基金(2017D01C309) 教育教学研究项目(2017JG03)。
关键词 腹腔镜模拟培训 总结性反馈 反馈方式 Laparoscopic simulation training Conclusive feedback Feedback method
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献16

  • 1Super NJ, Fried GM. The fundamentals of laparoseopic surgery: its time has come[J]. Bull Am Coll Surg,2008, 93(9) :30-32.
  • 2Peters JH, Fried GM, Swanstrom LL, et al. Development and val- idation of a comprehensive program of education and assessment of the basie fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery[ J]. Surgery,2004, 135( 1 ) :21-27.
  • 3Swanstrom LL, Fried GM, Hoffman KI, et al. Beta test results of a new system assessing competence in laparoseopic surgery [ J]. J Am Coll Surg,2006,202( 1 ) :62-69.
  • 4Derossis AM, Fried GM, Abrahamowiez M, et al. Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills[ J]. Am J Surg, 1998,175 ( 6 ) :482 -487.
  • 5Derossis AM, Bothwell J, Sigman HH, et al. The effect of prac- tice on performance in a laparoscopie simulator[ J]. Surg Endose, 1998,12(9) :1117-1120.
  • 6Fried GM, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, et al. Proving the value of simulation in laparoseopic surgery[ J ]. Ann Surg, 2004,240 ( 3 ) : 518-528.
  • 7MeCluney AL, Vassiliou MC, Kaneva PA, et al. FLS simulator performance predicts intraoperative laparoscopic skill [ J ]. Surg Endosc,2007,21 ( 11 ) : 1991 - 1995.
  • 8Vassiliou MC, Ghituleseu GA, Feldman LS, et al. The MISTELS program to measure technical skill in laparoseopic surgery: evi- dence for reliability [ J ]. Surg Endose,2006,20 (5) :744-747.
  • 9Sroka G, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, et al. Fundamentals of lap- aroscopic surgery simulator training to proficiency improves laparo- scopic performance in the operating room-a randomized controlled triaJ[J]. Am J Surg,2010,199(l) :115-120.
  • 10Zheng B, Hur HC, Johnson S, el al. Validity of using Fundamen- tals of Laparoseopie Surgery (FLS) program to assess laparoseopie competence for gynecologists[ J]. Surg Endose,2010,24(1) :152- 160.

共引文献19

同被引文献33

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部