摘要
在我国环境权本位问题上,现存在“权利本位说”“义务本位说”以及“公众环境利益说”几种观点。目前学界主流观点是以权利本位的视角去讨论环境权的各种问题,同时兼存其他观点的争论。“权利说”或“义务说”无疑是走向了一个问题的两个极端,单路径的思维方式难以达成环境法设定的价值理念与目标。“公众环境利益说”试图模糊环境权私权利的基本属性,将环境整体利益作为环境法领域的唯一保护对象,忽视了没有个体主义的关怀就难以达成环境法战略蓝图的问题。将法权中心主义与环境法相融合由此引出的全新核心范畴“环境法法权”可以有效统筹各种概念和现象,并由此可展开以环境权利和环境权力为基本支撑的理论构建。
On the issue of the standard of environmental rights in China,there are several viewpoints such as"right standard","obligation standard"and"public environmental interests".At present,the mainstream point of view in the academic circle is to discuss various issues of environmental rights from the perspective of right standard,and there are also arguments from other points of view.There is no doubt that"right theory"or"obligation theory"has gone to the two extremes of a problem.It is difficult to achieve the values and goals set by environmental law with a single way of thinking."Public environmental interest theory"attempts to blur the basic attributes of environmental rights and private rights,regards the overall interests of the environment as the only protection object in the field of environmental law,and ignores the problem that it is difficult to achieve the strategic blueprint of environmental law without the concern of individualism.The new core category"Faquanism of environmental law"derived from the integration of Faquanism and environmental law can effectively coordinate various concepts and phenomena,and thus can carry out theoretical construction based on environmental rights and environmental rights.
作者
门晓航
Men Xiaohang(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200050,China)
出处
《环境与发展》
2021年第1期21-28,共8页
Environment & Development
关键词
环境权
环境法本位
法权中心主义
环境法法权
Environmental right
Environmental law standard
Faquanism
Faquanism of environment law