论《正理滴论》中的不可得因

On“Non-Observing Sign”In The《Tshad-Ma-Rigs-Thisg》

依据法称在《正理滴论》为自比量品中,对三个正因解析的繁简程度及各正因所举例子的多寡,得出法称重视三个正因当中的“不可得因”,并且在“不可得因”中着重探讨“可现不可得的因”。通过分析和归纳“不可得因”中的十一种具体类型的特征,批判了剧宗林在《正理滴论译解》中认为“可现不可得的因”中的“未缘亲果可现不可得因”不能归入正因的论点。

his paper takes Chos-grgs’s self-inference chapter as the research object and points out that among the three correct reason Chos-grgs was more emphasizing the“non-observing sign”,and in it’s classification the“sign which is a non-observation of the suitable to appear”was discussed a lot,because the way of demonstrate this syllogism is consistent with the“selflessness of persons”and“selflessness of phenomenon”.Secondly,through analyzing and summarizing the eleven specific types of characteristics of“non-observing sign”,criticizes the idea in the Chinese version of《Tsha-ma-rigs-gter》which is“non catch direct result sign which is a non-observation of the suitable to appear”can not be attributed to the positive cause.