期刊文献+

事件性前瞻记忆的自我参照效应

The Self-Reference Effect on Event-Based Prospective Memory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用前瞻记忆的双任务实验范式,通过两个实验,探讨在高、低当前任务负载条件下,人格形容词的自我参照对事件性前瞻记忆的影响,以确定事件性前瞻记忆的加工机制。结果发现,自我参照能导致对事件性前瞻记忆双任务材料的更深层加工,从而有效提高前瞻记忆表现。同时,自我参照效应对事件性前瞻记忆的影响还受到当前任务负载的调节,表明前瞻记忆的提取受到自发与策略加工的动态交互影响,符合前瞻记忆的多重加工理论。 The study adopted the dual-task paradigm of prospective memory to determine the processing mechanism of event-based prospective memory.In two experiments,we compared the effects of self-reference of personality adjectives on event-based prospective memory under high and low ongoing task load.The results indicated that self-related materials were more deeply processed than non-self-related materials,suggesting that self-reference increased event-based prospective memory.The load of the ongoing task also influenced the effect of self-referencing on event-based prospective memory,suggesting that the influence of spontaneous and strategic processing on the retrieval of event-based prospective memory is dynamic and interactive.Our findings are consistent with the dynamic multiprocess theory of prospective memory.
作者 江黛苔 段亚杰 严帅 付思文 刘伟 JIANG Daitai;DUAN Yajie;YAN Shuai;FU Siwen;LIU Wei(College of Education,Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200234;Shanghai Songjiang Xinmin School,Shanghai 201612)
出处 《心理与行为研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第3期312-318,共7页 Studies of Psychology and Behavior
基金 上海市哲学社会科学规划课题(2017BSH009)。
关键词 事件性前瞻记忆 自我参照效应 任务负载 多重加工 event-based prospective memory self-reference effect task load multiple processing
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献25

  • 1王登峰,方林,左衍涛.中国人人格的词汇研究[J].心理学报,1995,27(4):400-406. 被引量:75
  • 2杨国枢,李本华.557个中文人格特质形容词之好恶度,意义度及熟悉度[R].台湾大学心理学系研究报告,1971:36-57.
  • 3Brewer, G. A., Knight, J., Meeks, J. T., & Marsh, R. L. (2011). On the role of imagery in event-based prospective memory. Consciousness and Cognition, co(3), 901-907.
  • 4Brewer, G. A., & Marsh, R. L. (2010). On the role of epi.~odic future simulation in encoding of prospective memories. Cognitive Neuroseienee, 1(2), 81-88.
  • 5Cohen, A. L., Jaudas, A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2008). Number of cues influences the cost of remembering to remember. Memory and Cognition, 36(1), 149-156.
  • 6Einstein, G. 0., & McDaniel, M. A. (1990). Normal aging and prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psycbology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(4), 717-726,.
  • 7Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Thomas, R., Mayfield, S., Shank, H., Morrisette, N., & Bmneiser, J. (2005). Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: Factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval. JournM of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(3), 327-342.
  • 8Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54(7), 493-503.
  • 9Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69-I 19.
  • 10Harrison, T. L., & Einstein, G. O. (2010). Prospective memory: Are preparatory attentional processes necessary for a single focal cue? Memory and Cognition, 38(7), 860-867.

共引文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部