经费来源视角下公办与民办高校管理理念比较

Comparison of Management Concepts Between State-owned Universities and Private Universities from the Perspective of Funding Sources

高校经费来源与管理理念具有耦合性。不同的经费来源衍生出不同的管理理念:国家财政投入与政府的价值目标形成了公办高校“维持”平稳的管理理念;民间资本对回报的追求形成了民办高校成本压缩型的管理理念。公办高校倾向于对现有秩序的维持,“无过即是功”;民办高校更看重成本的节约,“无功即是过”。对“过”的回避使公办高校易于产生利益相关者的“共谋现象”和“粉饰太平”;对“功”的追逐使民办高校更易于走向“形式主义”。公办高校的去行政化和民办高校的分类管理,有利于打破公办与民办高校管理理念的局限性。随着高校公私二元的淡化,二者管理理念的差距将逐渐缩小。

There is a coupling between the funding sources and the management concept in universities.Different funding sources lead to different management concepts:the state financial investment and the government's value goals form the management concept of"maintaining"stability in state-owned universities;the pursuit of return by private capital forms the management concept of cost compression in private universities.State-owned universities tend to maintain the existing order,"no fault is a success";private universities pay more attention to cost saving,"no merit is a failure".The avoidance of"fault"makes it easy for state-owned universities to produce"conspiracy"and"fraud"of stakeholders;the pursuit of"merit"makes it easier for private universities to move towards"formalism".De-administration of stateowned universities and classified management of private universities are conducive to breaking the limitations of management concept between state-owned universities and private universities.With the desalination of public-private duality,the gap of management concepts will gradually narrow.