摘要
“利润挤压论”认为,工资的提高会使利润受到挤压而减少,而利润减少必然会导致资本积累减少,因此工资的增长会使资本积累和就业减少。福斯特在用马克思相关理论批判“利润挤压论”时对马克思的解读和评论有诸多可商榷之处。福斯特认为,尽管利润减少会导致资本积累减少,但工资提高后,资本家可以提高价格以避免利润减少,因此工资上涨不会导致积累和就业减少。但马克思认为,工资的提高会导致利润减少,同时不会影响总体价格,而利润的下降并不必然导致积累和就业减少。
The“Profit Squeeze Theory”holds that higher wages will lead to a decrease in profits,which will inevitably lead to a decrease in capital accumulation,so wage growth will lead to a decrease in capital accumulation and employment.In criticizing“profit squeeze theory”with Marx’s related theory,Foster’s interpretation and comment on Marx have many debatable points.Forster believes that although a decrease in profits will lead to a decrease in capital accumulation,capitalists can raise prices after wage increases so that profits do not decrease,so wage increases will not lead to a decrease in accumulation.Marx believes that higher wages will lead to a decline in profits,while not a rise in prices,and a decline in profits will not necessarily lead to accumulation and employment reduction.
作者
吕少德
LV Shao-de(School of Political Theory,Army Military Medical University,Chongqing 400038,China)
出处
《河北学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第4期76-80,共5页
Hebei Academic Journal
基金
2018年度重庆市社会科学基金培育项目“人工智能技术推动的经济形态变革研究”(2018PY04)。
