期刊文献+

宁夏灌区大豆田化学药剂除草效果评价研究 被引量:2

Evaluation of the Effect of Herbicides in Soybean Fields in Ningxia Irrigation Area
下载PDF
导出
摘要 应用4种化学药剂对宁夏灌区大豆田除草效果进行研究。结果表明:用药后15 d,防除禾本科杂草效果比较好的是8.8%精喹禾灵乳油+250 g/L氟磺胺草醚水剂处理和10.8%精喹禾灵乳油处理;其次为480 g/L灭草松处理,防效分别达到98.2%、97.1%、87.8%。防除阔叶杂草效果比较好的是8.8%精喹禾灵乳油+250 g/L氟磺胺草醚水剂处理和480 g/L灭草松处理;其次为10.8%精喹禾灵乳油处理,防效分别达到95.4%、94.5%、87.3%。用药后30 d,防除禾本科杂草效果比较好的是8.8%精喹禾灵乳油+250 g/L氟磺胺草醚水剂处理和10.8%精喹禾灵乳油处理,防效分别达到95.7%、93.6%;防除阔叶杂草效果较好的是8.8%精喹禾灵乳油+250 g/L氟磺胺草醚水剂处理,防效达到91.2%。喷施4种除草剂的处理均较对照大豆产量具有不同幅度的增产,其中8.8%精喹禾灵乳油+250 g/L氟磺胺草醚水剂处理较对照增产669.0 kg/hm^(2),增产16.5%。 Weed control effect of 4 kinds of chemical agent,in soybean fields in irrigation area of Ningxia was studied in this paper.The results showed that after 15 days,8.8%quizalofopp-ethyl EC+250 g/L fomesafen treatment and 10.8%quizalofopp-ethyl EC treatment had better control effect for gramineae weeds,and then came 480g/L bentazone treatment;The efficacy was 98.2%,97.1%and 87.8%,respectively.8.8%quizalofopp-ethyl EC+250 g/L fomesafen treatment and 480 g/L bentazone treatment had better control effect for broad-leaved weeds,and then came 10.8%quizalofopp-ethyl EC;The efficacy was 95.4%,94.5%and 87.3%,respectively.After 30 days,8.8%quizalofopp-ethyl EC+250 g/L fomesafen treatment and 10.8%quizalofopp-ethyl EC treatment had better control effect for gramineae weeds;The efficacy was 95.7%and 93.6%,respectively.8.8%quizalofopp-ethyl EC+250 g/L fomesafen had better control effect for broad-leaved weeds;The efficacy was 91.2%.Compared with the CK,the 4 kinds of chemical agents can all made yield of soybean increase.Compared with the CK,8.8%quizalofopp-ethyl EC+250 g/L fomesafen treatment made the yield increase by 669.0 kg/hm^(2),increasing 16.5%.
作者 赵志刚 连金番 姬月梅 罗瑞萍 吴国华 马广福 Zhao Zhigang;Lian Jinpan;Ji Yuemei;Luo Ruiping;Wu Guohua;Ma Guangfu(Crops Institute,Ningxia Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences,Yinchuan,Ningxia 750002;Seed Administration Station,Shizuishan,Ningxia 753000;Service Center for Introducing Agricultural Technology,Helan,Ningxia 750200)
出处 《宁夏农林科技》 2021年第3期5-7,共3页 Journal of Ningxia Agriculture and Forestry Science and Technology
基金 国家大豆产业技术体系支撑项目(CARS-04)。
关键词 灌区 大豆田 化学除草剂 杂草 Irrigation area Soybean fields Chemical herbicide Weeds
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献26

  • 1丛建民,冯亚欣.大豆研究开发的前景及意义[J].白城师范学院学报,2004,18(4):8-12. 被引量:6
  • 2苏少泉.大豆田除草剂发展及问题[J].大豆通报,1996(5):1-3. 被引量:1
  • 3全国农田杂草考察组.中国大豆田主要杂草的分布和危害[J].杂草学报,1988,2(3):18-26.
  • 4由振国,1991年
  • 5李孙荣,农田杂草的生态经济防治原理,1990年
  • 6由振国,1986年
  • 7盖钧镒.试验统计方法[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000.157-209.
  • 8韩金声.植物医院实用技术指南[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,1996..
  • 9高焕文.旱地机械化保护性耕作技术教材[M].北京:中国农业大学,2001.
  • 10GB/T17980.109-2004农药田间药效试验准则(二)[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2004.

共引文献73

同被引文献8

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部