论“孤证不能定案原则”的限制适用

On the Restricted Application of No-verdict Principle Based on Isolated Evidence

“孤证不能定案原则”在司法实践中被广泛采用,但其适用范围的扩张与功能异化的问题逐渐在司法实践中显现出来。这源于学界对“孤证”的概念、范畴、性质、证明逻辑的混乱认定。只有摒弃对“孤证”的固有数量外观的思维定式,精确认定“孤证不能定案原则”在证据规则体系中的性质归属和阶梯状的逻辑选择结构,才能确保其对案件事实的认定、证据体系的建构以及证据规则体系的衔接发挥真正价值。

The no-verdict principle based on isolated evidence is widely used in judicial practice,but the expansion of its application scope and the problem of functional alienation gradually appears.This originates from the confusion of the concept,the category,the nature and the proof logic of isolated evidence in academic circles.Only by abandoning the thinking formula of the inherent quantity appearance of isolated evidence and accurately determining the nature attribution and the logical selection structure of the ladder in the system of evidence rules,can it ensure the real value of the determination of the case facts,the construction of the evidence system and the convergence of the system of evidence rules.