期刊文献+

腹腔镜胆囊切除术+LCBDE胆管一期缝合术与ERCP+腹腔镜胆囊切除术两种手术方式的疗效和安全性对比 被引量:17

Efficacy and safety:laparoscopic cholecystectomy+LCBDE vs.ERCP+laparoscopic cholecystectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)+腹腔镜胆总管探查术(LCBDE)胆管一期缝合术与ERCP+LC两种手术方式的疗效和安全性。方法选取2018年9月至2020年9月本院接诊的275例胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者,采用自愿入组方式将患者分为分为两组。对照组行LC+ERCP,观察组行LC+LCBDE胆管一期缝合手术,比较两组患者临床疗效和安全性。结果对照组术中出血量低于观察组出血量(P<0.001);对照组患者住院时间、住院费用、结石残留及肝功能异常率高于观察组(P<0.05);Logistic回归分析结果显示,对患者预后产生影响的因素为术后出血量、住院时间、费用及肝功能指标异常(P<0.05);观察组取石率高于对照组(P<0.05);两组并发症发生差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论LC+LCBDE胆管一期缝术疗效和安全性更高,利于改善患者的临床肝功能指标,减少患者住院时间和费用,临床价值较高,值得推广应用。 Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of two approaches:laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC)+laparoscopiccommon bile duct exploration(LCBDE)single⁃stage bile duct suture andendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)+LC.Methods A total of 275 patients with cholecystolithiasis complicated with choledocholithiasis admitted to our hospital from September 2018 to September 2020 were selected and divided into control and observation groups in the study.LC+ERCP was performed in the control group,and LC+LCBDE was performed in the observation group.The clinical efficacy and safety of the two groups were compared.Results The amount of intraoperative bleeding in the control group was lower than that in the observation group(P<0.001).As compared with the observation group,the hospitalization time was significantly longer,the hospitalization cost significantly larger and the rates of stone residue and abnormality of liver function were significantly higherin the control group(P<0.05).Logistic regression analysis showed that the factors affecting the prognosis were postopera⁃tive blood loss,length of stay,cost and abnormal liver function indexes(P<0.05).The lithotomy rate of the observa⁃tion group was significantly higher than that of the control group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion LC+LCBDE primary bile duct suture has higher efficacy and safety,which is beneficial for the improvement of clinical liver function indexes,reduction of hospital stay and lowering of cost.It is of high value clinically,worthy of promotion and application.
作者 张吉祥 何希平 张娟 廖海 肖永刚 廖煌 邓凯 ZHANG Jixiang;HE Xiping;ZHANG Juan;LIAO Hai;XIAO Yonggang;LIAO Huang;DENG Kai(Second Ward,Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery,Qianxi′nan People′s Hospital,Xingyi 562400,China)
出处 《实用医学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2021年第12期1574-1579,共6页 The Journal of Practical Medicine
基金 贵州省科技计划项目[编号:黔科合支撑【2020】4Y130号]。
关键词 腹腔镜胆囊切除术 腹腔镜胆道探查 胆管一期缝合术 ERCP+LC术 疗效 安全性 LC LCBDE bile duct primary suture ERCP+LC efficacy safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献147

  • 1姚礼.胆囊结石的治疗方法分析[J].中国医师杂志,2006,8(S1):404-405. 被引量:1
  • 2谢凯祥,涂湘炎,汤俊,贺宜伟,向海燕,黄飞舟.三镜联合治疗胆囊并胆总管结石的临床研究[J].中国内镜杂志,2008,14(9):970-973. 被引量:8
  • 3Zhi-MinGeng,Ying-MinYao,Qing-GuangLiu,Xin-JieNiu,Xiao-GongLiu.Mechanism of benign biliary stricture: A morphological and immunohistochemical study[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2005,11(2):293-295. 被引量:40
  • 4Collins C, Maguire D, Ireland A, Fitzgerald E, O'Sullivan GC. A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited. Ann Surg 2004; 239: 28-33.
  • 5Hemli JM, Arnot RS, Ashworth JJ, Curtin AM, Simon RA, Townend DM. Feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in a rural centre. ANZ J Surg 2004; 74:979-982.
  • 6Petelin JB. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 2003; 17:1705-1715.
  • 7Fiore NF, Ledniczky G, Wiebke EA, Broadie TA, Pruitt AL, Goulet RJ, Grosfeld JL, Canal DF. An analysis of periopera- tive cholangiography in one thousand laparoscopic chole- cystectomies. Surgery 1997; 122: 817-821; discussion 821-823.
  • 8Bansal VK, Misra MC, Garg P, Prabhu M. A prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage versus single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and com- mon bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 2010; 24- 1986-1989.
  • 9Erickson RA, Carlson B. The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with laparoscopic cholecvstectomies. Gastroenterology, 1995; 109:252-263.
  • 10Enochsson L, Lindberg B, Swahn F, Arnelo U. Intraopera- rive endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to remove common bile duct stones during routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not prolong hospitaliza- tion: a 2-year experience. Surg Endosc 2004; 18:367-371.

共引文献377

同被引文献181

引证文献17

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部