期刊文献+

SOX与XELOX方案对晚期胃癌患者血清肿瘤标志物及免疫功能的影响 被引量:10

Effects of SOX and XELOX Regimen on Serum Tumor Markers and Immune Function of Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨SOX方案(奥沙利铂联合替吉奥)与XELOX方案(奥沙利铂联合卡培他滨)对晚期胃癌患者血清肿瘤标志物及免疫功能的影响。方法按照随机数字表法将2014年1月—2017年4月我院收治的124例晚期胃癌患者分为两组,各62例。对照组行XELOX方案化疗,观察组行SOX方案化疗,比较两组患者的临床疗效、血清肿瘤标志物[糖类抗原50(CA50)、癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖类抗原19-9(CA19-9)、糖类抗原CA72-4(CA72-4)]、免疫功能(CD3^(+)、CD4^(+)、CD8^(+))、不良反应发生情况。结果观察组患者治疗有效率(54.84%)显著高于对照组(29.03%)(P<0.05);治疗后,两组患者血清CEA、CA199、CA50及CA72-4水平均显著低于治疗前,且观察组显著低于对照组(P<0.05);两组患者CD3^(+)、CD4^(+)及CD8^(+)水平均显著高于治疗前,且观察组显著高于对照组(P<0.05);两组患者白细胞减少、外周神经症状、血小板减少、腹泻、手足综合征、红细胞减少的发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论与XELOX方案相比,晚期胃癌患者行SOX方案化疗在提高临床疗效、降低血清肿瘤标志物水平和提高免疫功能等方面效果更佳,且不增加不良反应。 Objective To investigate the effects of SOX regimen(oxaliplatin combined with S-1) and XELOX regimen(oxaliplatin combined with capecitabine) on serum tumor markers and immune function of patients with advanced gastric cancer. Methods Totally 124 cases of patients with advanced gastric cancer in our hospital between January 2014 and April 2017 were divided into two groups by the random number table method, 62 cases in each group. The control group was given chemotherapy with XELOX regimen, while the observation group was given chemotherapy with SOX regimen. The clinical efficacy and the occurrence of adverse reactions were observed and compared between the two groups. The serum tumor markers [carbohydrate antigen 50(CA50), carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9(CA19-9), carbohydrate antigen 72-4(CA72-4) ], and immune function [CD3^(+), CD4^(+), CD8^(+)] were also compared between the two groups. Results The effective rate of patients in the observation group(54.84%) was higher than that of the control group(29.03%)(P<0.05). After treatment, the levels of CEA, CA19-9, CA50 and CA72-4 of patients were lower than those before treatment in both groups, and the levels of above mentioned indexes were lower in the observation group than in the control group(P<0.05). The levels of CD3^(+), CD4^(+) and CD8^(+) of patients in both groups were significantly higher than those before treatment, and they were significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group(P<0.05). No statistical differences were observed between the two groups in the incidence rate of leucopenia, peripheral nerve symptoms, low platelet count, diarrhea, hand-foot syndrome and erythropenia(P>0.05). Conclusion Compared with XELOX regimen, SOX regimen for patients with advanced gastric cancer had better results in increasing the clinical efficacy, decreasing serum levels of tumor markers, and improving immune function. The SOX regimen did not increase the incidence of adverse reactions of patients.
作者 陈守华 姚卫东 季从飞 田思源 顾寄树 CHEN Shouhua;YAO Weidong;JI Congfei;TIAN Siyuan;GU Jishu(Department of Oncology,the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nantong University,Nantong,Jiangsu,226361,China)
出处 《肿瘤药学》 CAS 2021年第2期215-218,228,共5页 Anti-Tumor Pharmacy
基金 江苏省卫生厅资助项目(K200403)。
关键词 晚期胃癌 SOX方案 XELOX方案 免疫功能 肿瘤标志物 Advanced gastric cancer SOX regimen XELOX regimen Immune function Tumor markers
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献23

  • 1黄荻,丁莉坤,丁黎,徐贵丽,贺建昌.LC-MS法测定人血浆中赖诺普利及其在药代动力学中的应用[J].中国药科大学学报,2006,37(5):428-431. 被引量:7
  • 2丁莉坤,周霞,丁黎,杨林,文爱东.甲磺司特活性代谢物M-1的人体药代动力学[J].中国药科大学学报,2007,38(2):153-156. 被引量:1
  • 3Kouchi Y, Maeda Y, Ohuchida A, et al. Potassium oxonate modulation of 5-fluorouracil-indueed myelotoxicity in murine and human colony forming assays of hematopoietic precursor cells [ J ]. Toxicol Lett,2002,135 ( 1/2 ) : 11 - 18.
  • 4Kouchi M, Fnjii M, Kanamori N, et al. Effect of gastrectomy on the pharmacokinetics of S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine, in resectable gastric cancer patients [ J ]. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 2007,60 ( 5 ) :693 - 701.
  • 5Van Groeningen C J, Peters GJ, Schornagel JH, et al. Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of oral S-1 in patients with advanced solid tumors[J]. J Clin Oncol,2000,18(14) :2 772 - 2 779.
  • 6Kitamura R, Satoh T, Maeda M, et al. Enzyme immunoassay of potassium oxonate using specific antibody isolated by immunosorbent gel [ J ]. Yakugaku Zasshi, 1994,114 ( 3 ) : 171 - 175.
  • 7Matsushima E, Yoshida K, Kitamura R, et al. Determination of S- 1 ( combined drug of tegafur), 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine and potassium oxonate and 5-fluorouracil in human plasma and urine using high-performance liquid chromatography and gas chromatography-negative ion chemical ionization mass spectrometry[ J]. J Chromatogr B, 1997,691 ( 1 ) :95 - 104.
  • 8Liu K, Zhong D, Zou H, et al. Determination of tegafur, 5-fluorouracil, gimeracil and oxonic acid in human plasma using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [ J ]. J Pharm Biomed Anal, 2010,52(4) :550 -556.
  • 9Hoff PM, Saad ED, Ajani JA, et al. Phase I study with pharmacokinetics of S-1 on an oral daily schedule for 28 days in patients with solid tumors [ J ]. Clin Can Res,2003,9 ( 1 ) : 134 - 142.
  • 10Cohen SJ,Leichman CG,Yeslow G,et al. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of once daily oral administration of S-1 in patients with advanced cancer[ J ]. Clin Can Res, 2002,8 (7) : 2 116 - 2 222.

共引文献45

同被引文献123

引证文献10

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部