期刊文献+

γ-干扰素释放试验QFT-GIT检测可疑结核感染患者不确定结果的影响因素分析 被引量:4

Influencing factors for indeterminate test results of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube detection in patients with suspected tuberculosis infection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨可疑结核感染患者的γ-干扰素释放试验QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube(QFT-GIT)不确定结果(ITRs)的影响因素。方法回顾2019年2月至2020年2月浙江大学医学院附属金华医院2473例可疑结核感染患者QFT-GIT结果,同时记录患者入院时的WBC、淋巴细胞数(L)、血清总蛋白(TP)、血清白蛋白(Alb)、ALT、AST等指标水平,比较不同性别、不同年龄组(0~5岁、6~15岁、16~30岁、31~45岁、46~60岁、61~75岁、≥76岁)ITRs发生率,分析ITRs产生的影响因素。结果采用QFT-GIT检测2473份可疑结核感染患者标本,其中ITRs为190例,确定结果(阴性或者阳性)为2283例,ITRs总发生率为7.68%,男性发生率为8.5%(124/1460),女性发生率为6.5%(66/1013),不同性别组ITRs发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);0~5岁年龄组ITRs发生率最高[17.3%(18/104)],且与16~30岁组[5.6%(17/304)]、31~45岁组[4.6%(20/435)]、46~60岁组[7.4%(49/665)]、61~75岁组[7.4%(49/662)]比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.01),6~15岁组[10.3%(9/87)]和31~45岁组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),≥76岁组[12.9%(28/216)]和16~30岁组、31~45岁组、46~60岁组、61~75岁组比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05),ITRs组和确定结果组性别和年龄差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。ITRs组TP、Alb以及L水平明显低于确定结果组(均P<0.01),ALT、AST以及WBC水平高于确定结果组(均P<0.01)。多因素logistic回归分析显示QFT-GIT ITRs发生的独立危险因素有低TP(OR=0.946,95%CI:0.936~0.956),低Alb(OR=0.901,95%CI:0.868~0.935),高ALT(OR=1.034,95%CI:1.022~1.047),高WBC(OR=1.064,95%CI:1.015~1.115),低L(OR=0.962,95%CI:0.939~0.982)。结论不同性别对QFT-GIT检测可疑结核感染ITRs发生率无明显影响,低龄(0~5岁)或者高龄(≥76岁)ITRs发生率最高,此外低TP、低Alb、低L和高ALT、高WBC是QFT-GIT检测出现ITRs的独立危险因素。 Objective To evaluate the influencing factors for indeterminate test results(ITRs)of Quanti FREON-TB Gold In-Tube Test in patients with suspected tuberculosis infection.Methods A total of 2473 patients with suspected tuberculosis were tested with QFT-GIT from February 2019 to February 2020 in Jinhua Hospital.The white blood cell counts,lymphocyte counts,total serum protein,serum albumin,ALT,AST were also tested.The incidence of the ITRs in different gender and age groups(0~5,16~30,31~45,46~60,61~75,≥years)were compared,and the influencing factors of ITR were analyzed.Results Among 2473 samples of QFT-GIT tests,190 were indeterminate results with an overall incidence rate of 7.68%,8.5%(124/1460)for males and 6.5%(66/1013)for females.There was no significant gender difference in the incidence of ITRs(P>0.05).The incidence of ITRs in age groups of 0~5,16~30,31~45,46~60,61~75 were 17.3%(18/104),5.6%(17/304),4.6%(20/435),7.4%(49/665)and 7.4%(49/662),respectively(all P<0.01).There was significant difference in ITR incidence between age group 6~15[10.3%(9/87)]and age group 31~45(P<0.05).There were significant differences in ITR between age group≥76[12.9%(28/216)]and age groups 16~30,31~45,46~60,61~75(all P<0.05).There was no significant difference in age distributions of patients between indeterminate results group and determinate results group(P>0.05).The total serum protein level,albumin level and the lymphocyte counts in patients with ITRs were significantly lower than those in patients with determinate results(P<0.01).Meanwhile,the level of ALT and AST,white blood cell counts in patients with ITR were significantly higher than those in patients with determinate results(P<0.01).Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that low total serum protein(OR=0.946,95%CI:0.936~0.956),low albumin(OR=0.901,95%CI:0.868~0.935),increased ALT(OR=1.034,95%CI:1.022~1.047),increased white blood cell counts(OR=1.064,95%CI:1.015~1.115),lymphocytopenia(OR=0.962,95%CI:0.939~0.982)were significant predictors of QFT-GIT indeterminate results.Conclusion There were no significant difference in gender between indeterminate results group and determinate results group.Patients aged 0~5 years and≥76 years have the highest incidence of ITRs,low total serum protein,low albumin,increased ALT,increased white blood cell counts and lymphocytopenia are the significant predictors of indeterminate results of QFT-GIT.
作者 王玉 陈晓俊 陈伟 何平 浮苗 WANG Yu;CHEN Xiaojun;CHEN Wei;HE Ping;FU Miao(Department of Clinical Laboratory,Affiliated Jinhua Hospital,Zhejiang University School of Medicine,Jinhua 321000,China)
出处 《浙江医学》 CAS 2021年第11期1184-1187,共4页 Zhejiang Medical Journal
基金 金华市中心医院中青年科研启动基金(JY2017-2-10)。
关键词 Γ-干扰素释放试验 不确定结果 结核感染 危险因素 Interferon-γrelease assays Indeterminate test results Tuberculosis infection Significant predictors
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献44

  • 1袁小东,敖国昆,全昌斌,张静,李红,田媛,秦崇,刘哲,田梅.肺双重血供的CT灌注技术及其应用于肺结核的初步研究[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2011,5(20):5913-5918. 被引量:22
  • 2Verhagen LM,Maes M, Villalba JA, et al. Agreement betweenQuantiFERON? -TB Gold In-Tube and the tuberculin skin test andpredictors of positive test results in Warao Amerindian pediatric tuber-culosis contacts[ J]. BMC Infect Dis, 2014, 14( 1) :383-395.
  • 3Cho K, Cho E, Kwon SI, et al. Factors associated with indeterminateand false negative results of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube test inactive tuberculosis[ J]. Tuberc Respir Dis( Seoul),2012, 72(5):416425.
  • 4Yun JW,Chung HS,Koh WJ,et al. Significant reduction in rate ofindeterminate results of the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube test byshortening incubation delay [J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2014, 52( 1 ) :90-94.
  • 5Shim TS. Diagnosis and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection dueto initiation of anti-TNF therapy [ J ]. Tuberc Respir Dis ( Seoul),2014, 76(6) :261-268.
  • 6Harada N,Higuchi K,Yoshiyama T,et al. Comparison of the sensi-tivity and specificity of two whole blood interferon-gamma assays forM. tuberculosis infection[ J]. J Infect, 2008 , 56(5) :348-353.
  • 7Seto J, Ahiko T. Effectiveness of interferon-gamma release assays inthe tuberculosis contact investigation of elderly people[ J]. Kekkaku,2014, 89(4) :503-508.
  • 8Jeong SJ, Han SH, Kim CO, et al. Predictive factors for indetermi-nate result on the QuantiFERON test in an intermediate tuberculosis-burden country[ J]. J Infect, 2011,62(5) :347-354.
  • 9Pal M, Denkinger CM, Kik SV, et al. Gamma interferon release as- says for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection [ J ]. Clin Microbiol Rev, 2014, 27( 1 ) : 3-20.
  • 10Darby J, Black J, Buising K. Interferon-gamma release assays and the diagnosis of tuberculosis: have they found their place? [ J]. In- ter Med J, 2014, 44(7) : 6244532.

共引文献48

同被引文献43

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部