期刊文献+

生命伦理学原则主义困境与儒家伦理化解之道 被引量:1

The Dilemma of Bioethics Principle and the Solution of Confucian Ethics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 生命伦理学原则主义提出了尊重自主性、不伤害、行善和公正四项伦理原则,作为解决伦理问题最基本的约束和依据。然而,原则主义不是从一个体系完备的道德理论出发经过推理得出的自成体系的程序规则,无法从道德理论的本源上给出合理性的解释。原则主义在与具体道德境遇相结合时出现了不融贯性,这给原则主义带来了批评和理论困境。以“同心圆”关系伦理为主要特征的儒家伦理,通过日常生活中“仪式性”的道德教化,以不断内化的道德力量来驱动人们行为符合“礼”的德性规范,给原则主义困境的化解带来了新的尝试。 The bioethics ethical put forward four principles:respect for autonomy,nonmaleficence,beneficence,and justice,which are the basic constraints and basis for solving ethical problems.However,principalism is not a self-contained procedural rule derived from a complete system of moral theory,and cannot give a reasonable explanation from the origin of moral theory.The incoherence of principalism with specific moral circumstances has brought criticism and theoretical dilemma to principalism.Confucian ethics,which is mainly characterized by“concentric circle”relationship ethics,drives people's behavior to conform to the“ritual”virtue norms through the“ritual”moral education in daily life,and brings a new attempt to resolve the principled dilemma.
作者 王培培 WANG Peipei(Higher Education Research Center,Wuhan Institute of Technology,Wuhan 430205,China)
出处 《中国医学伦理学》 2021年第7期882-886,共5页 Chinese Medical Ethics
关键词 原则主义 道德境遇 融贯性 儒家伦理 道德内化 Principalism Moral Situation Coherence Confucian Ethics Moral Internalization
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献30

  • 1DeGrazia, David. "Common Morality, Coherence, and the Principles of Biomedical Ethics". Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 2003,(13):227.
  • 2Green, R. M. , Gert, B. , Clouser, K.D. "The Method of Public Morality versus the Method of Principlism". Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1993, (18):477.
  • 3Beauchamp, Tom Land DeGrazia,David. "Principle and Princilism". Handbook of Bioethics, edited by George, Khushf. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004: 57.
  • 4Beauchamp, Tom L. "Principlism and Its Alleged Competitors". Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 1995, (5) : 181.
  • 5Beauchamp, Tom L. and Childress, James F. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York, Oxford University Press, 2001 : 3.
  • 6Richardson, H.S. "Specifying Norms as a Way to Re solve Concrete Ethical Problems". Philosophy and Public Af- fairs. 1990,(19):279-310.
  • 7Gert, Bernard, Culver, Charles M. and Clouser, Danner. Bioethics: A Return to Fundamentals. Oxford University Press, 1997:71.
  • 8Lustig, B. A. The Method of 'Principlism' : a Critique of the Critique. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1992, (17) :489.
  • 9Beauehamp, Tom L. and Childress, James F. Princi pies of Biomedical Ethics. New York. Oxford University Press, 1994: 106.
  • 10许志伟.生命伦理--对当代生命科技的道德评估[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2006:11.

共引文献44

同被引文献12

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部