期刊文献+

CATA方法应用于手膜的消费者感官研究 被引量:3

Check-all-that-apply(CATA)method applied to consumer research of sensory attributes of hand mask products
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用Check-all-that-apply(CATA)问卷和喜好度量表研究了6款手膜产品的感官特征和消费者偏好。研究结果表明,6款市场样品的喜好度排序为589≥561≥322≥403>986≥902。手膜类产品在膜布贴合、膜布透气、使用过程中无漏液、取下后手部粘腻、取下后手部油腻这5个感官属性上表现相近。喜好平均值影响(Mean impact)结果表明,料体分布均匀、膜布柔软、使用过程无漏液、取下后手部滋润、清洗后手部柔滑5个感官属性出现会让消费者更喜欢,产品香气不好闻会降低消费者的喜好度。CATA分析喜好度平均值影响结果为手膜的喜好度预测提供依据,制定更优的产品开发方案,同时CATA问卷调研方法也为新品类的消费者调研提供新的解决方法。 Check-all-that-apply(CATA)questionnaire and liking scale were used to study 6 hand mask products’sensory attributes and consumer’s preference.The liking sorting results of 6 hand mask products are 589≥561≥322≥403>986≥902.The hand mask products are similar in mask cloth fitting,mask cloth being breathable,no leakage during use,being sticky after taking off and being greasy after taking off.Mean impact of liking results show that consumers prefer the hand mask products with five sensory attributes,including uniform distribution of mask essence,soft mask cloth,no leakage during use,moisturizing after taking off and being smooth after cleaning;however,if the product aroma is not good enough,the consumers'preference will be reduced.CATA analysis of mean impact of liking provides a basis for predicting the preference for hand mask products,which is useful to make a better product development plan.CATA questionnaire survey method also provides a new solution for consumer research of new categories.
作者 孟欣 吴梦洁 杨洁 王静 亓玉锋 MENG Xin;WU Meng-jie;YANG Jie;WANG Jing;QI Yu-feng(Shandong Huawutang Biotechnology Co.,Ltd.,Jinan,Shandong 250101,China;Shanghai Zhuangyu Testing Technology Co.,Ltd.,Shanghai 201108,China)
出处 《日用化学品科学》 CAS 2021年第7期38-44,共7页 Detergent & Cosmetics
关键词 手膜 消费者调研 CATA 偏爱 平均值影响 hand mask consumer research CATA preference mean impact
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献55

  • 1倪冰选,焦晓宁.微胶囊技术及其在非织造布中的应用[J].产业用纺织品,2009,27(5):29-33. 被引量:3
  • 2李赛钰,王晓,马广存,时新刚,邓煜光,耿岩玲.毛白杨雄花序营养成分分析及评价[J].山东科学,2004,17(3):10-12. 被引量:8
  • 3黄爱玲.黄酮类化合物药理作用研究进展[J].安徽农学通报,2007,13(10):71-72. 被引量:35
  • 4Albert A, Varela P, Salvador A, et al. Overcoming the issues in the sensory description of hot served food with a complex texture. Application of QDA, flash profiling and projective mapping using panels with different degrees of training[J]. Food Quality and Preference,2011,22:463-473.
  • 5Silva R C S N, Minim V P R, Simiqueli A A, et al. Optimized Descriptive Profile: A rapid methodology for sensory description[J]. Food Quality and Preference,2012,24:190- 200.
  • 6Dairou V, Sieffermann J M. A comparison of 14 jams characterized by conventional profile and a quick original method, the flash profile[J]. Journal of FoodScience,2002,67(2):826-834.
  • 7Delaure J, Sieffermann J M. Sensory mapping using flash profile. Comparison with a conventional descriptive method for the evaluation of the fiavonr of fruit dairy products[J]. Food Quality and Preference,2004,15(4):383-392.
  • 8Talking Sense About. Flash Profiling and Napping[EB/OL]. Sensoryvisions.
  • 9Coxon A P M. Sorting Data: Collection and Analysis (lrd edition)[M].Sage Publication, 1999.
  • 10Rosenberg S, Nelson C, Vivekana P S. A multidimensional approach to structure of personality impressions[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968,9:283.

共引文献36

同被引文献33

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部