期刊文献+

术前营养风险评估及干预在胸腹腔镜联合食管癌根治术患者中的应用效果 被引量:6

The effect of applying preoperative nutritional risk assessment and interventions in patients undergoing thoracic laparoscopy combined with radical resection for esophageal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨基于风险评估指导下的术前营养干预在胸腹腔镜联合食管癌根治术(TEL)患者中的应用效果。方法选择2019年2月至2020年6月在我院拟行TLE的患者95例,采用分层随机法分为干预组48例与对照组47例。对照组给予围术期常规护理干预及术后营养干预,干预组给予风险评估指导下的术前营养干预。比较两组患者营养学指标、手术相关指标、并发症。结果术前1天、术后1周,干预组TEL患者血清前白蛋白(PA)、视黄醇结合蛋白(RBP)、转铁蛋白(TRF)高于对照组(P<0.05);术后肛门排气时间、引流管拔除时间、住院时间短于对照组(P<0.05)。切口感染等并发症发生率低于对照组(χ2=4.597,P<0.05)。结论基于风险评估指导下的术前营养干预有助于改善TEL患者营养状况,促进患者术后康复,减少并发症的发生。 Objective To investigate the effect of the application of preoperative nutritional risk assessment and interventions in patients undergoing thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy(TLE).Methods Ninety-five TLE patients admitted to our hospital from February 2019 to June 2020 were selected.The patients were divided into the experiment group(n=48)and the control group(n=47).The control group was given perioperative routine nursing interventions while the experiment group was given preoperative nutritional risk assessment and interventions.Afterwards,nutritional indexes,operation-related indexes and complications were compared between the two groups.Results Before 1 day of surgery and after 1 week of surgery,the levels of serum prealbumin(PA),retinol binding protein(RBP)and transferrin(TRF)were higher in the experiment group than those in the control group(P<0.05).Anal exhaust time,drainage tube removal time and hospitalization time in the experiment group were shorter than those in the control group(P<0.05).Incision infection rates and other complications in the intervention group were lower than those in the control group(χ2=4.597,P<0.05).Conclusion Preoperative nutritional interventions guided by risk assessment can help improve the nutritional status,promote the postoperative recovery,and reduce the complications.
作者 李佩佩 彭纪芳 于跃 LI Pei-pei;PENG Ji-fang;YU Yue(Department of Thoracic Surgery,The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Jiangsu Province Hospital,Nanjing 210009,China)
出处 《实用医院临床杂志》 2021年第4期71-74,共4页 Practical Journal of Clinical Medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(编号81902453)。
关键词 食管癌 胸腹腔镜联合食管癌根治术 主观整体营养评估 术前营养支持 Esophageal cancer Thoracic laparoscopy combined with radical resection Patient generated subjective global assessment Preoperative nutritional support
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献183

  • 1陈伟,蒋朱明,张永梅,王秀荣,陈春明,史轶蘩.欧洲营养不良风险调查方法在中国住院患者的临床可行性研究[J].中国临床营养杂志,2005,13(3):137-141. 被引量:214
  • 2路潜,李晓清,张彦虎.食管癌病人术前营养状况的初步测评[J].护士进修杂志,2006,21(5):392-394. 被引量:10
  • 3杨辉,Shane Thomas,张拓红,刘峰.维多利亚州住院病人满意度监测的方法学[J].中国卫生质量管理,2006,13(4):14-18. 被引量:52
  • 4August DA, Huhmann MB. A. S. P. E. N. clinical guidelines: nutrition support therapy during adult anticancer treatment and in hematopoietic cell transplantation [ J ]. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, 2009, 33(5):472-500.
  • 5Bozzetti F, Arends J, Lundholm K, et al. ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition: non-surgical oncology[ J]. Clin Nutr, 2009, 28(4) :445 -454.
  • 6Braga M, Ljungqvist O, Soeters P, et al. ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition : surgery[ J]. Clin Nutr, 2009, 28 (4) :378 - 386.
  • 7Weimann A, Braga M, Harsanyi L, et al. ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition : Surgery including organ transplantation[J]. Clin Nutr, 2006, 25(2) :224 -244.
  • 8Arends J, Bodoky G, Bozzetti F, et al. ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition : Non-surgical oncology [J]. Clin Nutr, 2006, 25 (2) :245 -259.
  • 9Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD, et al. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus [J]. Lancet Oncol, 2011, 12(5) :489 -495.
  • 10Detsky AS, McLaughlin JR, Baker JP, et al. What is subjective global assessment of nutritional status [J]. J Parenter Enteral Nutr, 1987, 11(2): 8-13.

共引文献506

同被引文献71

引证文献6

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部