摘要
在大数据时代,为了减少同案不同判现象的发生,最高人民法院发布了《关于统一法律适用加强类案检索的指导意见(试行)》,在其中明确了类案检索制度,要求各地人民法院在审理案件遇到特定情形时,应当进行类案检索。从结果来看,类案检索有助于统一法律适用,树立司法权威,但此结果并不一定会出现在民族地区的民事审判中。因为在民族地区,民事审判有其特殊之处,为统一裁判而强制推行类案检索,将可能会带来适用上的困境。为了更具体论述此种困境,本文拟以民族习惯的适用为视角,探讨类案检索在民族地区民事审判中可能遇到的适用困境,通过困境的成因分析,发现类案检索在民族地区民事审判的适用路径。
In the era of big data,in order to reduce the occurrence of different judgments in the same case,the Supreme People's Court issued the"Guiding Opinions on Uniform Law Application and Strengthening the Search of Types of Cases(for Trial Implementation)",which clarified the search system for similar cases and required local people’s courts to conduct a category case search When a case encounters a specific situation in a trial,a category case search shall be conducted.Judging from the results,searching for similar cases helps to unify the application of the law and establish judicial authority,but this result may not necessarily appear in civil trials in ethnic areas.Because in ethnic areas,civil trials have their own specialties,compulsory search for similar cases for the purpose of unified judgments may bring difficulties in application.In order to discuss this dilemma in more detail,this article intends to explore the applicable dilemmas that may be encountered in civil trials in ethnic areas in case retrieval from the perspective of the application of ethnic customs.Through the analysis of the cause of the dilemma,it is found that similar case retrieval is in civil trials in ethnic areas.
作者
张融
石剑桥
ZHANG Rong;SHI Jian-qiao(School of Law,Guangxi Normal University,Guilin Guangxi 541004)
出处
《牡丹江大学学报》
2021年第7期23-28,共6页
Journal of Mudanjiang University
基金
最高人民法院2019年度司法研究重大课题“大数据、区块链、人工智能在司法审判领域的融合应用问题研究”。
关键词
类案检索
民族习惯
民事审判
Category case search
National habit
Civil trial