期刊文献+

构建“一带一路”高水平投资协定:基于征收条款的考察 被引量:3

Construction of the High-Level B&R Investment Agreements:A Study Based on the Expropriation Clauses
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "一带一路"投资面临的风险自不待言,学界对构建"一带一路"争端解决机制也有许多设想。无论是多层次的争端解决机制,还是国际商事法庭,甚至是设立多元争端解决中心,从本质上而言都是优化方案。"一带一路"沿线国家大多是发展中国家,在这些国家和地区进行投资时面临的政治风险比较大,具体表现为征收、国有化和政策变化。同时,我国与这些沿线国家和地区之间的双边投资协定,对我国企业的域外投资保护作用尚显不足。因此,有必要以征收为切入点,以中国双边投资协定中关于征收和补偿条款为研究对象,考察"一带一路"下克服政治风险的条约进路。构建高水平的双边投资协定网络有利于更高水平地保护我国企业在沿线国家和地区的投资,也有利于我国参与国际投资治理体系,为之提供公共产品。 Given the self-evident investment risks in the Belt and Road(B&R), researchers have been proposing ideas on constructing the dispute settlement mechanism. Whether it is a multi-level dispute settlement mechanism, an international commercial court, or a multi-level dispute settlement center, are in essence optimization schemes. As most of the B&R countries are developing ones, the investment is facing relatively higher political risks, such as expropriation, nationalization and policy changes. Meanwhile, the current bilateral investment agreements between China and these countries and regions are not significant in protecting Chinese enterprises’ overseas investment. It is therefore necessary to study the approaches to overcome political risks of the agreements in the background of the B&R, with expropriation as the entry point, and expropriation and compensation clauses in China ’s bilateral investment agreements as the research object. The construction of a high-level bilateral investment agreement network contributes not only to the high-standard protection of Chinese enterprises’ investment in B&R countries and regions, but also China’s participation in the international investment governance system, for which China can provide public products.
作者 沈伟 SHEN Wei(School of Law,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200030,China)
出处 《兰州大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第3期138-152,共15页 Journal of Lanzhou University(Social Sciences)
基金 国家社会科学基金重点项目“坚持和完善中国特色社会主义基本经济制度研究”(20AZD011) 教育部哲学社会科学研究后期资助项目“中美贸易摩擦和国际经济秩序研究”(20JHQ072) 中国法学会2020年度部级法学研究课题“国际经贸规则体系变化及中国应对研究——以中美贸易摩擦为切入”(CLS [2020] ZX055)。
关键词 “一带一路” 政治风险 征收 补偿 双边投资协定 Belt and Road political risk expropriation compensation bilateral investment agreement
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献72

  • 1蒋冠宏,蒋殿春.中国对发展中国家的投资——东道国制度重要吗?[J].管理世界,2012,28(11):45-56. 被引量:271
  • 2郭玉军,孙敏洁.美国诉讼和解与中国法院调解之比较研究[J].法学评论,2006,24(2):19-28. 被引量:20
  • 3宋鲁郑.利比亚大撤侨背后的中国[DB/OL].观察者网.http://ww.guancha.cn/song-lu-zheng/2011—10-10—55610.shtml.
  • 4联合国秘书处.世界发展中的跨国公司[M].南开大学译.北京:商务印书馆.1975.18—19.
  • 5S. H. Robock.Political risk: identification and assessment[J]. Columbia Journal of World Business, Vol.6, No.4, 1971:6-20.
  • 6Stephen J. Kobrin.When does political instability result in increased investment risk [J].Columbian Journal of World Business, Vol. 13, No.2, 1978:113-122.
  • 7Mark Fitzpatrick.The Definition and Assessment of Political Risk in International Business: A Review of the Literature [J]. Academy of Management Review, Vol.8, No.2, 1983: 249-254.
  • 8Michael Porter, the Competitive Advantage of Nations [M]. New York: Free Press, 1990:9.
  • 9Thomas L. Brewer.An Issue Area Approach to the Analysis of MNC - Government Relations[J].Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 23, No.2, 1992:301.
  • 10Paul R Krugman and Maurice Obstfeld.International Econo- mics: Theory and Practice [M].New York: Harper Collins, 1994:162.

共引文献158

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部