期刊文献+

基于二维斑点追踪成像技术探讨中重度二尖瓣反流术后三维射血分数降低的影响因素

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的基于二维斑点追踪成像(STI)技术探讨中重度二尖瓣反流(MR)术后左心室三维射血分数(Heart Model EF)降低的潜在预测因子。方法选取2017年1月—2018年7月拟行手术的中重度MR病人52例,按照术后1年左心室Heart Model EF比术前降低程度的不同分为A组31例(收缩功能正常或降低程度≤10%)、B组21例(降低程度>10%)。选取30名健康志愿者作为对照组。比较3组病人的常规超声心动图参数以及左室心肌纵向应变参数,并分析术后1年Heart Model EF降低的预测因子。结果术前,A组左室收缩期整体纵向应变(GLS)、左室心尖部收缩期纵向峰值应变(Apex-LS)、左室心尖段收缩期纵向峰值应变(ALS)、左室前壁收缩期纵向峰值应变(A-LS)及左室前侧壁收缩期纵向峰值应变(AL-LS)的绝对值均小于对照组(P<0.05),B组全部超声左室心肌纵向应变参数的绝对值均小于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);随着术后时间的增加,A组和B组超声左室心肌纵向应变各项参数逐渐升高,直到术后1年,A组各项参数基本恢复正常,但B组明显低于A组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。单因素Logistic回归分析提示,GLS、左室基底段收缩期纵向峰值应变(BLS)及左室下壁收缩期纵向峰值应变(I-LS)为术后Heart Model EF降低的影响因素(P<0.05),GLS、BLS及I-LS曲线下面积分别为0.693、0.817及0.702,临界值分别为-18.26%、-18.93%、-18.37%,敏感度分别为68%、79%及66%,特异性分别为93%、78%及91%。进一步多因素Logistic回归分析,提示仅有BLS用于预测中重度MR术后三维射血分数降低有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论STI可为中重度MR病人在选择手术时机时提供可靠参考依据,左室GLS、BLS及I-LS均可用作中重度MR术后三维射血分数降低的预测因子,其中BLS临床价值更大。
出处 《中西医结合心脑血管病杂志》 2021年第13期2242-2245,共4页 Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine on Cardio-Cerebrovascular Disease
基金 江苏省卫计委科技计划项目(No.Z201612)。
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献45

  • 1王晨阳,黎春雷,刘红云,金丹,邓又斌.二维斑点追踪技术对主动脉瓣反流患者左心室功能的评价[J].中华医学超声杂志(电子版),2013,10(9):726-730. 被引量:5
  • 2Khalil Fattouch,Sebastiano Castrovinci,Giacomo Murana,Marco Moscarelli,Giuseppe Speziale.Surgical management of moderate ischemic mitral valve regurgitation: Where do we stand?[J].World Journal of Cardiology,2014,6(11):1218-1222. 被引量:5
  • 3Lancellotti P, Tribouilloy C, Hagendorff A, et al. Recommendations of the eehocardiographic assessment of native valvular regurgitation : an executive summary from the European association of cardiovascu- lar imaging [J]. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2013, 14 (7) : 611-644.
  • 4Bouow RO, Carabello BA, Kanu C, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease : a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force in Practice Guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease) : developed in collaboration with the Society of Car- diovascular Anesthesiologists : endorsed by the Society for Cardiovas- cular Angiograhy and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Sur- geons [ J ]. Circulation, 2006,114 ( 5 ) : e84-e231.
  • 5Schuler G, Peterson KL, Johnson A, et al. Temporal response of left ventricular performance to mitral valve surgery [J]. Circulation, 1979,59(6) : 1218-1231.
  • 6Urschel CW, Covell JW, Graham TP, et al. Myocardial systolic veloc- ities and deformation assessed by speckle tracking for early detec- tion of left ventricular dysfunction in asymptomatic patients with se- vere primary mitral regurgitation [J]. Echocardiography, 2012, 29 (3) :326-333.
  • 7Ross J Jr. Adaptations of the left ventricular to chronic volume over- load[J]. Circ Res, 1974,35(Suppl Ⅱ ):64-70.
  • 8Perry G J, Wei C, Hankes GH, et al. Angiotensin Ⅱ receptor block- ade does not improve left ventricular function and remodeling in subacute mitral regurgitation in the dog [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002,39(8): 1374-1379.
  • 9Rosenhek R, Rader F. Outcome of watchful waiting in asymptomatic severe mitral regurgitation [J]. Circulation, 2006, 113 (18) : 2238-2244.
  • 10Bertini M, Sengupta PP, Nucifora G, et al. Role of left ventricular twist mechanics in the assessment of cardiac dyssynchrony in heart failure [ J ]. J AC C Cardiovasc Imaging, 2009,2 ( 12 ) : 1425 - 1435.

共引文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部