期刊文献+

接纳承诺疗法和辩证行为疗法的比较分析 被引量:10

Comparative Analysis of Acceptance Commitment Therapy and Dialectical Behavior Therapy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过病理机制、哲学背景、治疗模式和症状应用四个方面的比较分析,对比接纳承诺疗法和辩证行为疗法之间的具体差异,以便帮助来访者实现其目标。尽管这两种心理治疗方法在病理机制解释和哲学背景上的侧重点各不相同:前者用心理僵化来解释心理疾病,侧重接纳的作用;而后者用情绪失调来解释心理疾病,侧重接受和改变之间的综合;但在治疗模式和症状应用上又有许多相似之处:二者都使用正念和隐喻技术,同时都用于治疗抑郁、焦虑、创伤后应激障碍等。 Through comparative analysis of pathological mechanism,philosophical background,treatment mode and symptom application,the specific differences between acceptance commitment therapy(ACT)and dialectical behavior therapy(DBT)are compared in order to help clients better achieve their goals.The two approaches of psychotherapy have different emphasis on the explanation of pathological mechanism and philosophical background:the former uses psychological rigidity to explain psychological diseases and focuses on the role of acceptance;while the latter uses emotional disorders to explain mental illness,focusing on the synthesis between acceptance and change.Meanwhile there are many similarities in the treatment models and symptom applications:they both use mindfulness and metaphorical techniques,and both are applicable to depression,anxiety,post-traumatic stress disorder,etc.
作者 张岩岩 胡知仲 卢梓航 胡茂荣 ZHANG Yan-yan;HU Zhi-zhong;LU Zi-hang(Department of Psychosomatic Medicine,The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University,Nanchang 330006,China;不详)
出处 《医学与哲学》 北大核心 2021年第12期46-49,共4页 Medicine and Philosophy
基金 2020年国家自然科学基金项目(81960261)。
关键词 接纳承诺疗法 辩证行为疗法 行为疗法 acceptance commitment therapy dialectical behavior therapy behavior therapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献30

  • 1Franks CM. Behavior therapy: An overview [J]. Ann Rev Behav Ther Theory Pract, 1982,8:1 -38.
  • 2Beck AT. Cognitive therapy: Past, present, and future [J]. J Con- sult Clin Psychol, 1993, 61(2): 194 -198.
  • 3Hayes SC. Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies [J]. Behav Ther, 2004, 35(4) : 639 -665.
  • 4Hayes SC, Follette VM, Linehan M. Mindfulness and acceptance: Expanding the cognitive-behavioral tradition [ M]. New York: The Guilford Press, 2004:1 - 30.
  • 5Yovel I. Acceptance and commitment therapy and the new genera- tion of cognitive behavioral treatments [ J]. Israel J Psychiatry Relat Sci, 2009, 46(4) : 304 -309.
  • 6Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, Wilson KG. Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change [ M]. New York: The Guilford Press, 2003:13 -49.
  • 7McCracken LM, MacKichan F, Eccleston C. Contextual cognitive- behavioral therapy for severely disabled chronic pain sufferers: ef- fectiveness and clinically significant change [J]. Eur J Pain, 2007, 11(3): 314-322.
  • 8Hayes SC. Analytic goals and the varieties of scientific contextual- ism [ M]. Michigan : University of Michigan, Context Press, 1993: 11 -35.
  • 9Barnes-Holmes Y, Hayes SC, Barnes-Holmes D, et al. Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition [ J]. Adv Child Dev Behav, 2002, 28:101 - 138.
  • 10Hayes SC, Luoma JB, Bond FW, et al. Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes and outcomes [J]. Behav Res Ther, 2006,44(1): 1-25.

共引文献217

同被引文献138

引证文献10

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部