期刊文献+

基于年龄和性别的中国正常成年人脊柱-骨盆矢状位形态的多中心研究 被引量:7

Age-and gender-related sagittal spinal-pelvic alignment in Chinese adult population:a multicenter study with 786 asymptomatic subjects
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的建立基于性别与年龄的中国正常成年人脊柱-骨盆矢状位参数正常参考范围,并评估年龄、性别和种族对脊柱-骨盆矢状位参数的影响。方法通过多中心联合前瞻性纳入年龄20~89岁的中国正常成年人共786名。应用EOS低辐射X线机摄站立位全身X线片以评估脊柱-骨盆矢状位形态。测量胸椎后凸角(thoracic kyphosis,TK)、腰椎前凸角(lumbar lordosis,LL)、骨盆入射角(pelvic incidence,PI)、骨盆倾斜角(pelvictilt,PT)、骶骨倾斜角(sacral slope,SS)、下腰椎前凸(L4~S1 lumbar lordosis,LLL)、整体倾斜(global tilt,GT)、T1骨盆角(T1-pelvic angle,TPA)和矢状面平衡(sagittal vertical axis,SVA),并计算PI-LL值和前凸分布指数(LLL/LL,LDI)。采用Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry disability index,ODI)评估患者生活质量。应用相关性系数(intraclass correlation coefficient,ICC)评估观察者内和观察者间测量数据的可信度。比较不同性别与年龄组的脊柱-骨盆参数,并与文献中不同种族人群的结果进行对比分析。结果786名正常成人身体质量指数(body mass index,BMI)为23.7±7.1 kg/m2,ODI为6.9%±2.5%(0~18%)。建立按照年龄和性别分组的矢状位参数,ICC为0.86~0.95,表明可信度较好至优秀。统计结果显示男性与女性间多项矢状面参数的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),女性PI(45.0°vs.41.4°)、PT(13.9°vs.10.7°)、PI-LL(1.8°vs.-0.5°)和GT(13.5°vs.10.9°)均明显高于男性(P<0.001),而男性LLL(28.6°vs.26.6°)和LDI(0.68 vs.0.63)则明显高于女性(P<0.001)。自40岁组至80岁组PI-LL、SVA、GT和TPA均随着年龄增加而明显升高;而LL、LLL、LDI则逐渐降低,TK随年龄增长缓慢。不同种族间正常成年人脊柱-骨盆矢状面参数的对比显示,中国人PI、SS、TK、LL较美国人小,而PI-LL较高;与日本人相比,中国人PI、SS和LL均较小。随着年龄增长,本研究中国人群与日本、美国人群各矢状面参数保持较为一致的变化趋势。结论成功建立了基于年龄和性别的正常成年中国人脊柱-骨盆矢状面形态参数正常参考范围,不同年龄和性别间的矢状面形态存在明显差异。不同种族人群为维持矢状面平衡的脊柱-骨盆复合体代偿模式也存在差异,因此,评估脊柱畸形以及制定脊柱矫正手术方案时应充分考虑性别、年龄以及种族等因素。 Objective To establish age-and gender-based normative values of sagittal spinal-pelvic alignment in Chinese adult population,and to investigate influence of age,gender and ethnicity on sagittal spinal-pelvic alignment in Chinese normal adults.Methods A total of 786 asymptomatic Chinese adult volunteers aged between 20 and 89 years were prospectively recruited from different spine centers.The inclusion criteria were:1)age between 20 to 89 years old;and 2)Oswestry disability index(ODI)scored lower than 20.The exclusion criteria were:1)previous history of spinal,pelvic or lower limb pathologies that could affect the spine;2)presence of recent and/or regular back pain;3)previous surgeries on spine,pelvic and/or lower limb;and 4)pregnancy.Demographic characteristics of these subjects including age,gender,body weight and height were recorded.During the enrollment of volunteers,16 groups were defined based on the age(20 s,30 s,40 s,50 s,60 s,70 s and 80 s)and gender.Whole body biplanar standing EOS X-ray radiographs were acquired to evaluate the sagittal alignment.Spinal-pelvic parameters including pelvic incidence(PI),pelvic tilt(PT),sacral slope(SS),thoracic kyphosis(T5-T12,TK),lumbar lordosis(L1-S1,LL),lower lumbar lordosis(L4-S1,LLL),global tilt(GT),T1 pelvic angle(TPA)and sagittal vertical axis(SVA)were measured.Values of PI-LL and lordosis distribution index(LLL/LL,LDI)were calculated.Radiographic measurements of 100 subjects were randomly selected to determine the intra-and inter-observer reliabilities using inter-and intra-class correlation coefficients(ICC).The spinal-pelvic parameters were compared among volunteers between different age and gender groups.The comparison was also made among various ethnic population.Results The mean value was 23.7±7.1 kg/m2 for BMI and 6.9%±2.5%(range,0-18%)for ODI score.Each sagittal spinal-pelvic parameter was presented with mean value and standard deviationbased on age and gender.The ICCs of radiographic measurements ranged from 0.89 to 0.95,suggesting good to excellent intra-and inter-observer reliabilities.Significant differences were observed between males and females in multiple sagittal parameters(all P values<0.05).Compared to the male subjects,significantly higher values of PI(41.4°for male vs.45.0°for female,P<0.001),PT(10.7°for male vs.13.9°for female,P<0.001),PI-LL(-0.5°for male vs.1.8°for female,P<0.001),and GT(10.9°for male vs.13.5°for female,P<0.001)were documented in female subjects.Males had significantly higher values of LLL(28.6°for male vs.26.6°for female,P<0.001)and LDI(0.68 for male vs.0.63 for female,P<0.001).PI-LL,SVA,GT and TPA increased with aging from Group 40 s to Group 80 s,while LL,LLL and LDI decreased gradually,and TK decreased slowly with aging.Comparison of sagittal spinal-pelvic parameters between different ethnic subjects showed that Chinese adult population presented lower PI,SS,TK and LL as compared with American population;lower PI,SS and LL as compared with Japanese population.But the variation trend with aging tended to be consistent among different ethnic populations.Conclusion Age-and gender-based normative values of sagittal spinal-pelvic alignment were established in asymptomatic Chinese adult population.Sagittal spinal-pelvic alignment varies with age and gender,and presented different compensation mechanism among different ethnic populations.Therefore,to achieve balanced sagittal alignment,age,gender and ethnicity should be take intoconsideration when planning spine correction surgery.
作者 胡宗杉 马鸿儒 钱至恺 阿布都哈卡尔·克拉木 汤子洋 李韦彪 朱泽章 林子平 郑振耀 邱勇 刘臻 Hu Zongshan;Ma Hongru;Qian Zhikai;Abdukahar·Kiram;Tang Ziyang;Li Weibiao;Zhu Zezhang;Lin Ziping;Zheng Zhenyao;Qiu Yong;Liu Zhen(Departement of Spine Surgery,Nanjing Drumtower Hospital,the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School,Nanjing 210008,China;Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology,Prince of Wales Hospital,Faculty of Medicine,The Chinese University of Hong Kong,Hong Kong 999077,China)
出处 《中华骨科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2021年第13期844-855,共12页 Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
基金 国家自然科学基金(81772304) 江苏省自然科学基金(BK20170126) 江苏省重点医学中心(YXZXA2016009)。
关键词 成年人 性别因素 年龄因素 脊柱 骨盆 Adult Sex factors Age factors Spine Pelvis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献26

  • 1Schwab F, Blondel B, Chay E, et al. The comprehensive anatomi- cal spinal osteotomy classification[J]. Neurosurgery, 2014, 74(1): 112-120. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.182o.
  • 2Le Huec JC, Leijssen P, Duarte M, et al. Tboraeolumbar imbal- ance analysis for osteotomy planification using a new method: FBI technique[J]. Eur Spine J, 2011, 20(Suppl5): 669-680. DOI: 10. 1007/s00586-011-1935-y.
  • 3Schwab F, Ungar B, Blondel B, et al. Seoliosis Research Society- Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: a validation study[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2012, 37(12): 1077-1082. DOI: 10.1097/ BRS.0bO13e31823e 15e2.
  • 4Zhu F, Bao H, Liu Z, et aL Analysis of L5 incidence in normal population use of L5 incidence as a guide in reconstruction of lumbosaeral alignment[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2014, 39(2): E140-146. DOI: 10.1097,rBRS.0000000000000069.
  • 5Akbar M, Terran J, Ames CP, et al. Use of Surgimap Spine in sag- ittal plane analysis, osteotomy planning, and correction calculation [J], Neurosurg Clin N Am, 2013, 24(2): 163-172. DOI: 10.1016/j. nec.2012.12.007.
  • 6Zhu Z, Xu L, Zhu F, et al. Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis in asymptomatic adults: norms in Chinese populations[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2014, 39(1): E1-6. DOI: 10.1097/brs.00000000 00000022.
  • 7Blondel B, Schwab F, Bess S, et al. Posterior global malalignment after osteotomy for sagittal plane deformity: it happens and here is why[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2013, 38(7): E394-401. DOI: 10. 1097/BRS.0b013e 3182872415.
  • 8Schwab F, Lafage V, Shaffrey CI, et al. 138 The Schwab-SRS Adult Spinal Deformity Classification: Assessment and Clinical Correlations Based On a Prospective Operative and Non-Opera- tive Cohort[J]. Neurosurgery, 2012, 71: E556. DOI: 10.1227/01. neu.0000417728.42473.0b.
  • 9Schwab F, Lafage V, Boyce R, et al. Gravity line analysis in adult volunteers: age-related correlation with spinal parameters, pelvic parameters, and foot position[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2006, 31: E959-967. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000248126.96737.0f.
  • 10Smith JS, Klineberg E, Schwab F, et al. Change in Classification Grade by the SRS-Schwab Adult Spinal Deformity Classification Predicts Impact on Health-Related Quality of Life Measures: Pro- spective Analysis of Operative and Non-operative Treatment[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2013, 10: 1097. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b 013e31829ee563.

共引文献90

同被引文献39

引证文献7

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部