论医疗美容纠纷权利救济路径——基于合同和侵权竞合的展开

On the right relief path of medical beauty disputes--Based on the development of concurrence of contract and tort

在医疗美容纠纷解决中往往是违约行为与侵权行为同时存在,在权利救济方式上经常出现“请求权竞合”的情形。按照我国当前的法律适用规范,如受害者选择合同规范路径救济,那么损害赔偿范围限定在财产损失。在此基础上,如受害者能够证明医疗美容机构存在欺诈事由,或可主张惩罚性损害赔偿;如受害者选择侵权规范路径救济,那么赔偿范围可扩充至精神损害赔偿。事实上,基于上述医疗美容纠纷的权利救济路径并非完全周延,在《民法典》即将生效的新时代背景下,有必要对一般医疗美容纠纷权利救济路径进行反思,从中发现问题,为今后的医疗美容纠纷权利救济路径完善提供参考。

In the settlement of medical cosmetology disputes,there are often both breach of contract and tort,and there is often"concurrence of claims"in the way of right relief.According to the current applicable legal norms of our country,if the victim chooses the path of contract to remedy,the scope of compensation is limited to property loss.On this basis,if the victim can prove that there is fraud in the medical beauty agency,or claim punitive damages;if the victim chooses the path of tort,the scope of compensation can be extended to mental damage compensation.In fact,based on the above-mentioned medical beauty dispute right relief path is not completely extended.In the new era background of civil code coming into effect,it is necessary to reflect on the right relief path of general medical beauty dispute,and find problems from reflection,so as to provide reference for improving the right relief path of medical beauty dispute in the future.