期刊文献+

Prognostic factors and its predictive value in patients with metastatic spinal cancer 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 BACKGROUND The spine is the most common location of metastatic diseases.Treating a metastatic spinal tumor depends on many factors,including patients’overall health and life expectancy.The present study was conducted to investigate prognostic factors and clinical outcomes in patients with vertebral metastases.AIM To investigate prognostic factors and their predictive value in patients with metastatic spinal cancer.METHODS A retrospective analysis of 109 patients with metastatic spinal cancer was conducted between January 2015 and September 2017.The prognoses and survival were analyzed,and the effects of factors such as clinical features,treatment methods,primary lesions and affected spinal segments on the prognosis of patients with metastatic spinal cancer were discussed.The prognostic value of Frankel spinal cord injury functional classification scale,metastatic spinal cord compression(MSCC),spinal instability neoplastic score(SINS)and the revised Tokuhashi score for prediction of prognosis was explored in patients with metastatic spinal tumors.RESULTS Age,comorbidity of metastasis from elsewhere,treatment methods,the number of spinal tumors,patient’s attitude toward tumors and Karnofsky performance scale score have an effect on the prognosis of patients(all P<0.05).With respect to classification of spinal cord injury,before operation,the proportion of grade B and grade C was higher in the group of patients who died than in the group of patients who survived,and that of grade D and grade E was lower in the group of patients who died than in the group of patients who survived(all P<0.05).At 1 mo after operation,the proportion of grade A,B and C was higher in the group of patients who died than in the group of patients who survived,and that of grade E was lower in patients in the group of patients who died than in the group of patients who survived(all P<0.05).MSCC occurred in four(14.3%)patients in the survival group and 17(21.0%)patients in the death group(P<0.05).All patients suffered from intractable pain,dysfunction in spinal cord and even paralysis.The proportion of SINS score of 1 to 6 points was lower in the death group than in the survival group,and the proportion of SINS score of 7 to 12 points was higher in the death group than in the survival group(all P<0.05).The proportion of revised Tokuhashi score of 0 to 8 points and 9 to 11 points were higher in the death group than in the survival group,and the proportion of revised Tokuhashi score of 12 to 15 points was lower in the death group than in the survival group(all P<0.05).Frankel spinal cord injury functional classification scale,MSCC,SINS and revised Tokuhashi score were important factors influencing the surgical treatment of patients with metastatic spinal cancer(all P<0.05).CONCLUSION Frankel spinal cord injury functional classification scale,MSCC,SINS and revised Tokuhashi score were helpful in predicting the prognosis of patients with metastatic spinal cancer.
出处 《World Journal of Clinical Cases》 SCIE 2021年第20期5470-5478,共9页 世界临床病例杂志
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献31

  • 1夏群,徐宝山,张继东,苗军,李建光,张晓林,周静.一期同体位前后联合入路手术治疗严重胸腰椎骨折脱位[J].中华骨科杂志,2006,26(7):433-437. 被引量:39
  • 2Lin B, Chen ZW, Guo ZM, et al. Anterior approach versus posterior approach with subtotal corpeetomy, decompression, and reconstruction of spine in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: a prospective randomized controlled study. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2011, [Epuh ahead of prirtt].
  • 3Denis F. The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine, 1983, 8:817-831.
  • 4Esses SI, Botsford D J, Kostuik JP. Evaluation of surgical treatmentfor burst fractures. Spine, 1990, 15:667-673.
  • 5Oner FC, Wood KB, Smith JS, et al. Therapeutic decision making in thoracolumbar spine trauma. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) , 2010, 35 Suppl 21:235-244.
  • 6Dai LY. Principles of management of thoracolumbar fractures. Orthop Surg, 2012, 4:67-70.
  • 7Hitchon PW, Tomer JC, Haddad SF, et al. Management options in thoracolumbar burst fractures. Surg Neurol, 1998, 49: 619- 627.
  • 8Tofuku K, Koga H, Ijiri K, et al. Combined posterior and delayed staged mini-open anterior short-segment fusion for thoracolumbar burstfractures. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2012, 25:38- 46.
  • 9Machino M, Yukawa Y, ho K, et al. Posterior/anterior combined surgery for thoracolumbar burst fractures-posterior instrumentation with pedicle screws and laminar hooks, anterior decompression and strut grafting. Spinal Cord, 2011, 49:573-579.
  • 10Sasani M, Ozer AF. Single-stage posterior corpectomy and expandable cage placement for treatment of thoracic or lumbar burstfractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2009, 34:33-40.

共引文献19

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部