期刊文献+

重审以鲁迅为中心的现代作家对老庄的批判

Re-examining the Criticism of Laozi and Zhuangzi from Modern Writers Represented by Lu Xun
下载PDF
导出
摘要 学界一般认为,现代作家对老庄的批判是出于拯救民族命运的现实目的,而未在学理上加以考量。这种看法是片面的,现代作家并不是“无暇返回东西文化的本原”,他们对老庄的批判其实已经超越了改造民族命运的功利目的,并且深入到文化深层进行本体论的考量——以充满力感的尼采哲学置换消极落后的老庄思想的潜在文化目的。鲁迅及众多作家的老庄批判透露出他们进行文化更新的潜在意图,只是这样的文化目的混糅在民族救亡的强大话语中,并为后者所遮掩。 Scholars generally believe that modern writers criticized Laozi and Zhuangzi for the purpose of the transformation of national destiny,rather than doctrinal considerations.However,this idea is onesided.It is not that modern writers have no time to return to the origin of the East and West culture,In fact,their criticism on Laozi and Zhuangzi has gone beyond the utilitarian purpose of changing national destiny and has gone deep into the culture with ontological considerations which replace the negative and outdated Laozi and Zhuangzi thoughts with Nietzsche’s powerful philosophy.But such cultural purposes were mixed with the strong national salvation discourse and were clouded by the latter.Lu Xun and other writers actually conveyed their potential purpose of cultural renewal by the criticism on Laozi and Zhuangzi.
作者 雷文学 LEI Wen-xue(College of Chinese Language and Literature,Fujian Normal University,Fuzhou 350007,China)
出处 《烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2021年第4期68-76,共9页 Journal of Yantai University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
基金 国家社科基金项目“现代作家对老庄的三种态度”(13BZW143)。
关键词 现代作家 老庄 批判 尼采 modern writers Laozi and Zhuangzi criticism Nietzsche
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献20

  • 1梁启超.国家思想变迁异同论[M].北京:中华书局,1901.
  • 2礼记·儒行[M].长沙:岳麓书社,1989:530.
  • 3.论语·子罕[M].太原:书海出版社,2001.103.
  • 4.论语·阳货[M].太原:书海出版社,2001.182.
  • 5康有为.中庸注[M].北京:中华书局,1987.208.
  • 6嵇文甫.晚明思想史[M].上海:上海东方出版社,1996:7-13.
  • 7[16]孟子·滕文公下[M]..
  • 8张岱年.儒家理想人格与现代化[J].书林,1990,(2).
  • 9谭嗣同.书简·上欧阳中鹄(十)[M].
  • 10龚自珍.壬癸之际胎观第四[M].

共引文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部