期刊文献+

体育学科评估与体育学科建设的关系辨析——基于制度变迁理论的分析 被引量:4

A study on the relationship between sports subject evaluation and sports subject construction——Based on the analyses of institutional change theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 体育学科评估是大学评价体系发展的有机组成部分,在学科评估制度变迁视野下,分析总结5轮体育学科评估展现出的特点和规律,揭示体育学科评估之于体育学科建设的正反两方面作用:体育学科评估提升了体育学科的学科地位、学科竞争力,强化了体育学科的发展规划性,但同时存在马太效应、同质化竞争、天花板效应等非预期结果。从政策演进角度,检视体育学科建设的理念与路径,提出要发挥多个主体能动性,建构符合体育学科发展规律的学科评估体系,引导体育学科差异化、特色化发展,整体提升体育学科建设水平。 Sports subject evaluation is an integral part of the development of university evaluation system.From the perspective of subject evaluation system change,this paper analyzes and summarizes the characteristics and laws of the first five rounds of sports subject evaluation,and reveals the positive and negative effects of sports subject evaluation on the construction of sports subject:sports subject evaluation improving the status and competitiveness of sports discipline,and strengthening the planning for the development of sports discipline,however,at the same time,there are some unexpected results such as Matthew effect,homogeneous competition,ceiling effect and so on.From the perspective of policy evolution,this paper examines the concept and path of sports subject construction,and proposes to give play to the initiative of multiple subjects,construct a subject evaluation system in line with the development law of sports subject,guide the differential and characteristic development of sports subject,and improve the overall level of sports subject construction.
作者 戴粦利 DAI Lin-li(Reacher Center for Modern State and University Governance,South China Normal University,Guangzhou 510631,China)
出处 《体育学刊》 CAS CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第4期75-80,共6页 Journal of Physical Education
基金 广东省教育科研重大项目“国家与社会互动中的大学治理研究”(2014JKZ011)。
关键词 体育学科 学科评估 学科建设 制度变迁 sports subject subject evaluation subject construction institutional change
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献156

  • 1汪信砚.人学与哲学的关系辨正[J].哲学动态,2002(6):2-6. 被引量:8
  • 2马晓强.“科尔曼报告”述评——兼论对我国解决“上学难、上学贵”问题的启示[J].教育研究,2006,27(6):29-33. 被引量:39
  • 3潘黎,刘元芳.基于学科、专业布局的我国普通高校分类的定量研究[J].科技进步与对策,2006,23(8):155-158. 被引量:3
  • 4Acemoglu, D. ,2003. "Why Not a Political Coase Theorem? Social Conflict, Commitment and Politics. " Journal of Comparative Economics. 31:620 - 52.
  • 5Acemoglu, D. ,2005. "The Rise of Europe : Atlantic Trade, Institutional Change and Economic Growth. " American Econom- ic Review. 95 ( 3 ) : 546 - 79.
  • 6Acemoglu, Robinson,2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge University Press.
  • 7Aoki, M. , 2001. Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
  • 82007. "Endogenizing Institutions and Institutional Changes. " Journal of Institutional Economics. 3 ( 1 ) : 1 -31.
  • 9Greif,A. ,2000. "The Fundamental Problem of Exchange:A Research Agenda in Historical Institutional Analysis. " Review of European Economic History. 4 : 251 - 84.
  • 10Greif,A. ,2004. " Institutions and Impersonal Exchange: The European Experience. " Working Paper No. 284 May 2004 :http ://papers. ssrn. com/sol3/papers, cfm? abstract_id = 548783.

共引文献80

同被引文献121

引证文献4

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部