期刊文献+

腹腔镜胆囊切除术联合胆总管切开取石T管引流术治疗胆囊合并胆总管结石的效果观察 被引量:6

Efficacy of LC combined with LCHTD ongallstone patients complicated with choledocholithiasis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术联合胆总管切开取石T管引流术(LC+LCHTD)在胆囊合并胆总管结石治疗中的临床效果。方法:选取60例胆囊合并胆总管结石患者,按照治疗方式的不同分为两组。对照组30例,采用传统开放胆囊切除术联合胆总管切开取石T管引流术(OC+OCHTD)治疗,观察组30例,采用腹腔镜胆囊切除术联合胆总管切开取石T管引流术(LC+LCHTD)治疗,对比两组的治疗效果。结果:观察组术中出血量少于对照组,住院时间短于对照组(P<0.05);观察组住院费用高于对照组(P<0.05);两组术后不同时间点疼痛程度(VAS)评分比较,观察组均低于对照组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者ALB下降幅度明显小于对照组(P<0.05),WBC、TBIL下降幅度比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组并发症发生率明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:LC联合LCHTD治疗胆囊合并胆总管结石患者效果理想,且安全性较高。 Objective:To investigate the effects of LC combined with LCHTD in the treatment of gallstone patients complicated with choledocholithiasis.Methods:60 patients with choledocholithiasis were divided into 2 groups according to the different methods of treatment,30 patients in the control group received conventional open cholecystectomy plus choledocholithotomy and T-tube drainage(OC+OCHTD)treatment,while another 30 patients in the observation group underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus laparoscopic choledocholithotomy and T-tube drainage(LC+LCHTD)treatment.Then the treatment effect of two groups were compared.Results:The intraoperative blood loss and length of hospital stays of the observation group was less than that of the control group(P<0.05);the cost of hospitalization was higher than that of the control group(P<0.05);VAS score of postoperative pain at different time points was lower than that of the control group,which was of statistical difference(P<0.05);ALB in the observation group decreased less than that of the control group(P<0.05);there was no statistical significance of WBC and TBIL in the decrease range(P>0.05);and the incidence of complications in observation group was significantly lower than that in control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:LC combined with LCHTD is effective and safe in the treatment of gallstone patients with cholecystolithiasis.
作者 卢天有 李国宝 LU Tianyou;LI Guobao(Dept,of General Surgery,the People's Hospital of Luoding,Luoding 527200,China)
出处 《华夏医学》 CAS 2021年第3期125-129,共5页 Acta Medicinae Sinica
关键词 胆囊合并胆总管结石 传统开放胆囊切除术 胆总管切开取石T管引流术 腹腔镜胆囊切除术 gallstone complicated with choledocholithiasis conventional open cholecystectomy choledocholithotomy T-tube drainage laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献92

  • 1Lapo Bencini,Cinzia Tommasi,Roberto Manetti,Marco Farsi.Modern approach to cholecysto-choledocholithiasis[J].World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy,2014,6(2):32-40. 被引量:28
  • 2顾大男.老年人年龄界定和重新界定的思考[J].中国人口科学,2000(3):42-51. 被引量:45
  • 3李国熊,张啸.ERCP并发症及防治对策[J].中国内镜杂志,2005,11(8):824-827. 被引量:96
  • 4孙学军,卢乐,石景森.肝胆管结石的微创外科治疗进展[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2006,13(4):403-405. 被引量:25
  • 5Tsuyuguchi T, Sakai Y, Sugiyama H, et al. Long-term fol- low-up after peroral cholangioscopy-directed lithotripsy in patients with difficult bile duct stones, including Mirizzi syndrome:an analysis of risk factors predicting stone re- currence[J]. Surg End Other Int Tech,2011,25(7) :2179- 2185.
  • 6Fujimoto T, Tsuyuguchi T, Sakai Y, et al. Long-term out- come of endoscopic papillotomy for choledocholithiasis with cholecystolithiasis[J]. Digestive Endoscopy, 2010,22 (2) :95-100.
  • 7Mu H,Gao J,Kong Q,et al. Prognostic factors and post- operative recurrence of calculus following Small-Incision sphincterotomy with papillary balloon dilation for the treatment of intractable choledocholithiasis: a 72-Month Follow-Up study [J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2015, 60 (7) : 2144- 2149.
  • 8Mu H, Gao J, Kong Q, et al. Prognostic factors and postoperative re-currence of calculus following Small-Incision sphincterotomy with pa-pillary balloon dilation for the treatment of intractable choledocholithi-asis: a 72-Month Follow-Up study. Dig Dis Sci, 2015 , 60(7) :2144-2149.
  • 9Mouret P. How I developed laparoscopic eholecystectomy [ J ]. Ann Acad Med Singapore, 1996,25 (5) :744.
  • 10Tzovaras G, Baloyiannis I, Zachari E, et al. Laparoendoscopic rendez- vous versus preoperative ERCP and ]aparoscopic cholecystectomy for the management of cholecysto-choledoehalithiasis : interim analysis of a controlled randomized trial [ J ]. Ann Surg,2012,255 ( 3 ) :435-439.

共引文献294

同被引文献84

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部