期刊文献+

医科达磁共振加速器初步临床实践 被引量:6

Preliminary clinical practice of Elekta Unity MR-linac
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的初步分析医科达磁共振加速器(Unity MR-Linac)摆位精度及流程时间等相关问题。方法回顾Unity MR-Linac实验入组患者共14例,统计分析所有分次的治疗时间(包括摆位、扫描、重新制订计划和出束时间)和各个方向的摆位误差。随机选取常规加速器使用一体架固定的患者11例,统计摆位误差。成组t检验两组摆位误差的差异。结果Unity组患者在左右、进出、升降方向的摆位误差分别为(-0.15±0.30)、(0.02±0.57)、(-0.10±0.28)cm;总体平均治疗时间为36.87min,其中摆位平均时长5.40min,扫描平均时长7.48min,自适应计划平均时长7.46min,出束平均时长9.48min。常规加速器组患者在上述3个方向的误差分别为(0.05±0.25)、(-0.01±0.25)、(-0.03±0.23)cm。两组摆位误差在左右方向不同(P<0.001),进出和升降方向相近(P=0.061、0.374)。结论除左右方向外,在无激光灯情况下患者的摆位误差与常规加速器摆位误差相近。应用流程在顺利情况下治疗时间也在患者承受范围之内。MR引导放疗应用前景广阔,流程上需要优化。 Objective To summarize the experience of ELEKTA Unity MR-linac in clinical application in our hospital and analyze the positioning accuracy,process time and other related issues.Methods A total of 14 patients enrolled in the Unity MR-Linac study were reviewed.All treatment time(including positioning,scanning,replanning,and beam discharge)and setup errors in 3directions were statistically analyzed.11 patients with conventional accelerators using the multifunctional immobilization system(MIS)were randomly selected to make statistical analysis of the setup errors,and the differences between the Unity group and the conventional accelerators using the MIS were compared using t-test.Results In the Unity group,the setup errors in X,Y and Z directions were(-0.15±0.30)cm,(0.02±0.57)cm and(-0.10±0.28)cm,respectively.The average treatment time was 36.87minutes.The average positioning time was 5.40minutes.The mean scan time was 7.48minutes,the mean adaptive plan time was 7.46minutes,and the mean beam time was 9.48minutes.In the conventional accelerator group,the setup errors were(0.05±0.25)cm,(-0.01±0.25)cm and(-0.03±0.23)cm,respectively.The results of the setup errors of patients fixed with MIS showed that there were significant differences in the left and right directions(P<0.001),while there were no significant differences in the Y and Z directions(P=0.061 and 0.374)between two groups.Conclusions Except in the X direction,there is no significant difference in setup errors between the Unity and conventional accelerator groups in the condition of laser-free system.Under smooth circumstances,the treatment time by using ATP(adapt to position)workflow will also be within the range of tolerance of the patients.Magnetic-guided radiotherapy has a promising application prospect,whereas the procedure needs to be optimized.
作者 覃仕瑞 程斌 田源 张可 郇福奎 Qin Shirui;Cheng Bin;Tian Yuan;Zhang Ke;Huan Fukui(Department of Radiation Oncology,National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College,Beijing 100021,China)
出处 《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2021年第7期688-691,共4页 Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
关键词 磁共振加速器 摆位误差 治疗时间 Magnetic resonance linac Setup error Treatment time
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献25

  • 1YanD,ViciniF,WongJ,等.自适应放射治疗[J].医学和生物学中的物理学,1997,42:123-132.
  • 2SimoneCB,LyD,DanTD,eta1.调强放疗、自适应放射治疗、质子放射治疗和自适应质子放射治疗局部晚期头颈部癌的比较[J].放射疗法与肿瘤学,2011,101(3):376-382.
  • 3LeiY,WuQ.离线自适应放疗计划设计与在线图像引导相结合的治疗前列腺癌[J].医学和生物学中的物理学,2010,55(8):2221-2234.
  • 4CazoulatG,LesaunierM,SimonA,eta1.从图像引导放射治疗到剂量引导放射治疗[J].癌症一放射疗法,2011,15(8):691-698.
  • 5AhunbavEE,ChenGP,ThatcherS,eta1.基于直接子野优化的全乳腺调强放射治疗[J].国际放射肿瘤学-生物学-物理学杂志,2006,67(4):1248-1258.
  • 60’DanielJC,GardenAS,SchwartzDL,eta1.头颈肿瘤调强放疗的腮腺剂量分析:结果与原先计划的一样吗?[J].国际放射肿瘤学一生物学一物理学杂志.2007,69(4):1290一1296.
  • 7RehbinderH,ForsgrenC,JohanLof,eta1.自适应放疗补偿患者摆位和治疗实施的误差[J].医学物理学,2004,31(121:3363-3372.
  • 8SchwartzDL,DongL.头颈部肿瘤自适应放疗:一个旧的目标可以演变成一个新的标准吗?[J].肿瘤学杂志,2011:690595.Epub2010Aug18.
  • 9CapelleL,MackenzieM,FieldC,eta1.头颈肿瘤术后自适应螺旋断层放射治疗的初步研究[J].临床肿瘤学,2012,24(3):208-215.Epub2011Dec22.
  • 10LiangJ,YanD,KestinU埘a1.自适应放疗计划实现运动靶区边界的最小化[J].国际放射肿瘤学一生物学一物理学杂志,2003,57:233-234.

共引文献29

同被引文献41

引证文献6

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部