期刊文献+

预防ICU患者大便失禁性皮炎的循证实践 被引量:39

Evidence-based practice in prevention of fecal incontinence associated dermatitis in ICU patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的总结预防ICU患者大便失禁性皮炎的循证证据,并评价其临床应用效果。方法应用循证护理的方法系统检索2010年1月—2019年9月国内外相关临床实践指南、专家共识和系统评价。评价并汇总最佳证据,制订审查条目进行基线审查,并基于审查结果分析促进与障碍因素。于2020年5月—9月将证据应用于临床,比较循证实践前后ICU患者失禁性皮炎发生率、护士对失禁性皮炎相关知识的认知水平以及对审查条目的执行率。结果最终纳入8篇文献,包括临床实践指南3篇、专家共识2篇、系统评价3篇,在风险评估和预防策略2方面总结了11条最佳证据。循证实践后,ICU患者失禁性皮炎发生率为19.10%,低于循证实践前(40.48%),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);护士对失禁性皮炎相关知识问卷的得分为(42.35±5.77)分,高于循证实践前(35.65±5.07)分,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。护士对审查条目2、4、5、6的执行率由循证实践前的0、0、66.67%、22.62%上升至100%、84.27%、97.75%、76.40%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。结论将预防ICU患者大便失禁性皮炎的最佳证据应用于临床,可降低失禁性皮炎发生率,提高护士对失禁性皮炎相关知识的认知水平以及执行依从性。 Objective To summarize the evidence for the prevention of fecal incontinence associated dermatitis in ICU patients and to evaluate its application effect. Methods To obtain the best evidence,we used the method of evidence-based nursing to search related guidelines,expert consensuses and systematic reviews from domestic and foreign databases from January 2010 to September 2019. The best evidence was evaluated and summarized;review indicators were developed;the baseline review was conducted,and facilitation and obstacles based on the review results were analyzed. From May to September in 2020,the evidence was applied to clinical practice,and the incidence of incontinence associated dermatitis,nurses’ cognitive level of incontinence associated dermatitis knowledge and the implementation rate of review items were compared before and after the application of evidencebased practice. Results Finally,8 articles were included,including 3 clinical practice guidelines,2 expert consensuses and 3 systematic reviews. 11 pieces of best evidence were summarized in terms of risk assessment and prevention strategies. After evidence-based practice,the incidence of incontinence associated dermatitis was 19.10%,which was lower than that before evidence-based practice(40.48%) with statistically significant differences(P<0.05);the score of nurses on incontinence associated dermatitis knowledge questionnaire was(42.35 ±5.77),which was higher than that before evidence-based practice(35.65±5.07),and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.001).The implementation rates of items 2,4,5,6 increased from 0,0,66.67% and 22.62% to 100%,84.27%,97.75% and76.40%,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.001). Conclusion The application of evidence-based practice in the prevention of fecal incontinence related dermatitis in ICU patients can reduce the incidence of incontinence associated dermatitis,improve nurses’ cognitive level and the implementation compliance.
作者 徐元元 史广玲 张燕红 徐建珍 刘娟 蒋学娟 杜海燕 XU Yuanyuan;SHI Guangling;ZHANG Yanhong;XU Jianzhen;LIU Juan;JIANG Xuejuan;DU Haiyan(Department of Critical Care,Brain Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing,210029,China;不详)
出处 《中华护理杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2021年第6期811-817,共7页 Chinese Journal of Nursing
关键词 重症监护病房 大便失禁 失禁性皮炎 循证护理学 Intensive Care Units Fecal Incontinence Incontinence Associated Dermatitis Evidence-Based Nursing
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献73

  • 1各类脑血管疾病诊断要点[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29(6):379-380. 被引量:33020
  • 2詹思延.临床指南研究与评价工具简介[J].中国循证儿科杂志,2007,2(5):375-377. 被引量:46
  • 3Nix DH. Validity and reliability of the Perineal Assessment Tool Ostomy Wound Manage, 2002,48 (2) : 43-49.
  • 4Bliss DZ,Zehrer C,Savik K,et al. An economic evaluation of four skin damage prevention regimens in nursing home residents with incontinence:economics of skin damage prevention. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, 2007,34(2) : 143-152.
  • 5Drivers DS. Perineal dermatitis in critical care patients. Crit Care Nurs, 2007,27 : 42-46.
  • 6Steininger A,Jukic - Puntigam M, Urban W, et al. Anpassung und priifung der inhahsvalidit t des instruments "Perineales Assessment Tool"(PAT). Procare,20l 1,16(4) :3-8.
  • 7Borchert K,Bliss DZ,Savik K,et al. The Incontinence- associated dermatitis and its severity instrument:development and validation. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, 2010,37 (5) : 527-535.
  • 8Bliss DZ,Savik K,Harms S,et al. Prevalence and correlates of per- ineal dermatitis in nursing home residents. Nursing Res,2006,55 (4):243-251.
  • 9Papanikolaou P, Lyne PA, Lycett EJ. Pressure ulcer risk assessment: application of logistic analysis. J Adv Nurs,2003,44(2) : 128-136.
  • 10方蘅英,林晓岚,胡爱玲.两种压疮危险评估表预测效果的比较研究[J].护理研究(上旬版),2007,21(11):2850-2851. 被引量:27

共引文献1706

同被引文献496

引证文献39

二级引证文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部