期刊文献+

上海市闵行区成年居民身高与体质量和腰围自报值与测量值的Bland-Altman分析 被引量:2

Bland-Altman analysis on the concordance of self-reported and measured height, weight and waist circumference of adult residents in Minhang district of Shanghai
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价上海市闵行区居民身高、体质量和腰围自报值与测量值的一致性,为采取有针对性的防治策略提供依据。方法 2017年6月—2018年5月,采用多阶段抽样方法,抽取≥18岁常住居民1 698人,采用自报和测量的方式分别收集身高、体质量、腰围数据,并进行一致性比较分析。结果调查对象身高、体质量、腰围知晓率分别为61.72%、61.66%、25.80%。调查对象身高自报值高于测量值1.14 cm,体质量自报值高于测量值0.17 kg,腰围自报值低于测量值2.72 cm,身高(t=15.18,P<0.01)、体质量(t=2.55,P=0.01)、腰围(t=12.03,P<0.01)自报值与测量值差值间差异均有统计学意义。80.92%调查对象自报BMI分类准确,超重肥胖调查对象自身BMI低估率12.04%、高估率5.71%。Bland-Altman分析显示,身高、体质量、腰围自报值与测量值的差值超出95%一致性限范围的点均<5%,分别为4.97%、1.31%、4.18%。结论上海市闵行区居民存在身高、体质量和腰围自报值与测量值整体一致性良好,但超重肥胖被自报低估并存的现象。 Objective To assess the concordance of self-reported and measured height, weight and waist circumference through Bland-Altman analysis. Methods A total of 1 698 local residents aged 18 years and above were randomly selected using multi-stage sampling method, the height, weight and waist circumference were reported by participants and also physically measured by study investigators.Two data sets were analyzed for the agreement by Bland-Altman analysis. Results The awareness rates for height, weight and waist circumference were 61.72%, 61.66% and 25.80%, respectively.Compared to the actual measured values, the self-reported height and weight were 1.14 cm higher and 0.17 kg heavier, while the self-reported waist circumference was 2.72 cm smaller, the differences were statistically significant(t=15.18,2.55,12.03,P<0.01,0.01, <0.01).80.92% of participants reported a proper classified BMI.Among participants with overweight and obesity, 12.04% underestimated while 5.71% overestimated their BMIs.Bland-Altman analysis showed that only 4.97%, 1.31% and 4.18% with the differences between self-reported and measured values in height, weight and waist circumference were above 95% limits of agreement(LoA). Conclusions There are smaller discrepancies between self-reported and measured values in height, weight and waist circumference among local residents in Minhang district of Shanghai.However, residents with overweight or obesity tend to underestimate their anthropometric values.
作者 刘蒲 程颖玲 许慧琳 徐东丽 LIU Pu;CHENG Ying-ling;XU Hui-lin;XU Dong-li(Minghang Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Shanghai 201101,China)
出处 《中国预防医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2021年第2期131-134,共4页 Chinese Preventive Medicine
基金 上海市卫生和计划生育委员会基金项目(201740057)。
关键词 身高 体质量 腰围 知晓率 准确性 Height Weight Waist circumference Awareness rate Accuracy
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献31

  • 1赵希刚,李坤成,李永忠.单次屏气电影法MRI评价左心室功能的初步研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2005,21(1):65-67. 被引量:12
  • 2陈卉.Bland-Altman分析在临床测量方法一致性评价中的应用[J].中国卫生统计,2007,24(3):308-309. 被引量:217
  • 3Bland JM,Altman DG.Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.Lancet,1986,i:307-310.
  • 4Bland JM,Altman DG.Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.Statis tical Methodsin Medical Research,1999,8:135-160.
  • 5Najib Aziz,Michael RI,Sally SD,et al.Interpreting Method Comparison Studiesby Useofthe Bland-Altman Plot:Reflecting the Importance of Sample Sizeby Incorporating Confidence Limitsand Predefined Error Limitsinthe Graphic.Clinical Chemistry,2004,50 (11):2216-2222.
  • 6卫生部.全国疾病监测地区(DSPs)慢性病及危险因素监测主要结果[EB/OL].http://www.chinacdc.cn/gwswxx/mbsqc/201109/t20110906-52141.htm,2011-09-06.
  • 7Starr GJ, Dal Grande E, Taylor AW, et al. Reliability of self- reported behavioral health risk factors in a South Australian telephone survey[J]. Public Health, 1999,23(5):528-30.
  • 8Monteiro CA, Florindo AA, Claro RM, et al. Validity of indica tors of physical activity and sedentariness obtained by telephone survey[J]. [Artiele in Portuguese] RevSaudePubliea, 2008 ,42 (4):575-81.
  • 9左辉,袁宝君,戴月,史祖民.江苏省居民超重与肥胖发生率变化的研究[J].江苏预防医学,2009,20(1):9-12. 被引量:17
  • 10覃玉,周金意,杨婕,陶然,王培桦,韩仁强,武鸣.江苏省2003年~2005年死因回顾抽样调查样本代表性和数据质量评价[J].江苏预防医学,2010,21(6):56-58. 被引量:6

共引文献237

同被引文献26

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部