近20年巴赫金符号学理论在中国的传播与接受--基于CiteSpace的文献计量研究

Research on the Bakhtin’s Semiotic Theory in China during the Recent 20 Years:Bibliometric Analysis Based on Citespace

本文以CNKI数据库所收论文为主要数据来源,运用CiteSpace引文分析工具考察近20年(1999-2020)巴赫金符号学理论在国内的接受与传播状况,梳理巴赫金符号学理论在中国的发展脉络与趋势。数据分析表明,近20年来巴赫金符号学理论在国内大致经历了四个时期:引介期(1999之前)主要集中于巴赫金符号学理论基本译介与阐释,研究成果零星分散;发展期(1999年-2008年)主要聚焦于狂欢、对话、复调理论,研究文献数量缓慢增加;繁荣期(2008年-2013年)发文量迅速增长,研究话题广泛;平缓期(2013年-2020年)整体研究较少,波动不大,研究热点不明显。在此基础上,本文进一步分析国内学者对巴赫金符号学理论研究的阶段性特征,及研究中存在的影响力量研究偏弱、研究源文本较少以及研究方法与视角亟待深入等问题。

Based on the database of CNKI journals,this paper mainly examines the acceptance and dissemination status of Bakhtin’s semiotic theory in China and its historical development context and trend during the past 20 years(1999-2020)by using CiteSpace citation analysis tools.The analysis shows that scholars’studies on Bakhtin’s semiotic theory has experienced four periods in China:the introduction period(before 1999)mainly focuses on the basic translation and interpretation of Bakhtin’s semiotic theory,which is sporadic and scattered;the development period(1999-2008)mainly puts more energy into the concepts related to carnival,dialogue and polyphony theory,and there has been a wave of research;the period of prosperity(2008-2013)during which the research on the influence of Bakhtin’s semiotic theory has gradually emerged and has a vigorous development trend;during the period of steady(2013-2020)the overall research is few,the fluctuation is not large,and there is no obvious focus on the research.At the same time,this paper also demonstrates the periodical characteristics of domestic scholars’research on Bakhtin’s semiotic theory.However,there are some problems such as weak researches on the influence of Bakhtin’s semiotic theory,less research source texts,and urgent need to reform and update the research methods and perspectives.