表见代理中被代理人可归责性研究

Study on the Accountability of Principal in Apparent Agency

对表见代理的构成要件是否包括被代理人的可归责性在理论界与实务界有不同看法。通过分析被代理人承担责任的正当性,构建利益权衡框架,类推适用善意取得制度,运用历史解释、比较法等方法,认为被代理人可归责性的确立有其必要性。在此基础上,对学界通行的归责原则进行比较研究,得出应以“风险归责原则”作为被代理人有无可归责事由的认定标准。

The Tencent Laoganma incident has once again aroused the discussion on the constitution of apparent agency The civil code does not give an answer to whether the constitutive requirements of apparent agency include the imputability of the principal,and there are different views in theory and practice.This paper analyzes the legitimacy of the principal's responsibility,constructs a framework of the balance of interests,applies the system of bona fide acquisition by analogy,and uses historical interpretation and comparative ways to conclude that the principal's liability is indeed necessary.On this basis,this paper makes a comparative study of the common imputation principles in the academic circles,and concludes that the"risk imputation principle"should be used as the standard for determining whether the principal has imputation causes.