中韩信托委托人债权人撤销权比较研究

A Comparative Study on Creditor’s Right of Revocation in China and South Korea

中韩两国信托委托人债权人撤销权,在本质上均属于民法债权人撤销权。两国民法债权人撤销权制度存在主体适用、区分有偿与无偿及其与证明责任分配的差异。两国信托委托人债权人的撤销权,在权利行使方面存在债权人认知能力推定的差异,在权利行使后果方面存在主体责任形式完备程度的差异。总体而言,两国信托法各有优劣。我国《信托法》未来修订时,可参考借鉴韩国《信托法》对委托人债权人撤销权行使后果的细致规定,从而使信托制度更好地融入我国《民法典》,充分落实和践行公平、诚信等社会主义核心价值观。

The creditot’s right of revocation in both China and South Korea essentially belong to civil law.The systems of creditor’s right of revocation in the two national civil laws are different in the aspects of subject application,distribution between paid and unpaid,and the burden of proof.There are differences in the presumption of creditor’s cognitive ability in the exercise of rights,and the completeness of the main liability is also different.Overall,the trust law of both countries have their own merits.When China’s Trust Law is revised in the future,we can refer to the detailed regulations on the consequence of creditor’s exercise of the right of revocation in South Korea’s Trust Law so as to better integrate the trust system into China’s Civil Code and fully implement the core socialist values.