期刊文献+

存在时依性混杂时的G方法 被引量:2

G-methods in the existence of time varying confounding
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的介绍处理时依性混杂的G方法,并对不同G方法进行探讨和比较。方法通过4个情境的模拟试验验证不同G方法在不同情境下对时依性混杂的处理效果,并应用英国生物样本库(UK Biobank)的数据集进行实例分析。结果模拟试验和实例分析结果均显示G方法能有效处理时依性混杂。模拟试验显示3种方法效果类似,G-computation易受G-null paradox的影响。随着时依性混杂因素数量增加,相比于G-computation和G-estimation,逆概率加权法(inverse probability of treatment weighting,IPTW)的效果波动较大。结论不同G方法都能适当地处理时依性混杂,降低统计分析过程中的偏倚大小。 Objective To introduce and compare different G-methods which can deal with time varying confounding.Methods The simulation experiments of four scenarios were carried out to verify the effects of different G-methods on time varying confounding in different situations.Dataset from UK Biobank was then analyzed using different G-methods.Results All three G methods can effectively deal with time varying confounding with similar performance,while G-computation was vulnerable to G-null paradox.However,with the increasing number of time varying confounders,the estimated effects of inverse probability of treatment weighting(IPTW)were more variable.Conclusion All of the three Gmethods can remove the bias resulted from time varying confounding appropriately.
作者 仇沁晓 尤东方 赵杨 QIU Qin-xiao;YOU Dong-fang;ZHAO Yang(Department of Biostatistics,School of Public Health,Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing 211166,China;Key Laboratory of Biomedical Big Data,Nanjing Medical University,Collaborative Innovation Center for Individual Medicine in Cancer,Nanjing 211166,China)
出处 《中华疾病控制杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2021年第6期625-631,共7页 Chinese Journal of Disease Control & Prevention
基金 国家重点研发计划(2016YFC1000207) 国家自然科学基金(81872709) 江苏省高等学校自然科学研究重大项目(18KJA110004)。
关键词 时依性混杂 碰撞偏倚 G方法 Time varying confounding Collider bias G-methods
  • 相关文献

同被引文献28

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部