股东表决权排除的类推适用——兼评宋某祥诉万禹公司除名决议效力案

Analogy of Voting Rights Exclusion:Comments on Song Mouxiang Case

以宋某祥案为代表的一系列判例表明,股东表决权排除规则能否类推适用,已成为近年来的司法难题。我国部分判例的否定性立场值得商榷,表决权排除以保障公司决议公正为目的,其类推适用具备正当性基础。在类推适用的范围上,现有学说采用的"标准"过于僵硬,需采用动态体系论的思想,以决议公正为基础性评价,以特别关系等五项要素为评价要素,以关联担保或关联交易为原则性示例,构建动态的类推适用体系。宋某祥案尚未达到类似关联担保的要素协同的强度,因而不宜排除被除名股东的表决权。

An amount of cases represented by the Song Yuxiang case show that whether the shareholder voting right exclusion rule can be applied by analogy has become a recent judicial difficult question.The negative position of some of our case law is questionable,and the exclusion of voting rights is aimed at ensuring the fairness of corporate resolutions,which is the basis of analogy.The"standard"model adopted by existing doctrines is too rigid,and the idea of a dynamic system theory should be adopted,which treats fairness as a foundational evaluation,five elements such as special relationship as evaluation elements,and related guarantees or related transactions as principle examples.The Song Yuxiang case has not yet reached the strength of synergy of elements similar to a related guarantee,and thus it is inappropriate to exclude the voting rights of the removed shareholder.