期刊文献+

论人工智能的刑事责任主体地位

On the Status of the Subject of Criminal Responsibility of Artificial Intelligence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 人工智能的发展备受法学界关注,虽然在当前阶段人工智能仍具有工具属性,不能作为犯罪主体,更不能独立承担刑事责任,但在很大程度上影响着刑事责任的认定和分配。强人工智能出于自我思考后的犯罪行为自主承担刑事责任符合刑法的规定,对强人工智能进行处罚具有可行性,不管从刑法的前瞻性来讲,还是从规范人工智能的发展来讲,对强人工智能都有必要作为刑事主体认定。 The development of artificial intelligence has attracted much attention in the legal field.Although artificial intelligence still has tool attributes at the current stage,and it cannot be the subject of crime,let alone bear criminal responsibility independently,but it affects the determination and distribution of criminal responsibility.Strong artificial intelligence autonomously assumes criminal responsibility for criminal behavior after self-thinking is in line with the provisions of the criminal law,and it is feasible to punish strong artificial intelligence,regardless of the forward-looking nature of the criminal law or the development of normative artificial intelligence,strong artificial intelligence is necessary to be identified as a criminal subject.
作者 刘文燕 陈思宇 LIU WEN-yan;CHEN SI-yu(School of Humanities and Law,northeast Forestry University,Harbin Heilongjiang 150000,China)
出处 《齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2021年第6期93-96,共4页 Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)
基金 青年教师创新项目计划:生态环境资源犯罪刑法规制的困境反思与综合对策研究 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目:大数据时代公民个人信息风险及其刑法应对(2572020BN04)。
关键词 人工智能 刑事责任主体 自主意识 可罚性 artificial intelligence criminal responsibility free will punishability
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献57

共引文献216

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部