期刊文献+

中美公共卫生教育热点与进展研究 被引量:3

Research on Hot Spots and Progress of Public Health Education in China and America
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的了解30年中美公共卫生教育的研究热点和趋势,并为后疫情时期我国公共卫生人才培养方式及形式提供启示。方法以"Web of Science TM核心合集"(WOS)作为美国数据来源,中国知网(CNKI)作为国内数据来源,运用CiteSpace信息可视化分析软件,展现30年中美公共卫生教育关键词共现与突变,以及共被引分析知识图谱。结果通过关键词共现分析,得出美国的研究主题有关知识态度、教育模式和影响、教育体系等,中国的研究主题有关公共卫生硕士、人才培养、培养模式、教学改革、预防医学等。通过文献共被引分析,把握美国这一时间段的前沿主题和热点领域。结论后疫情时期我国公共卫生教育要进一步增加体系化建设,加强实践教学,改革、完善公共卫生教育的课程体系和教学方法。 Objective To understand the research hotspots and development trends of public health education in China and the United States in recent 30 years, and to provide reference for the training methods and forms of public health talents after the epidemic. Methods "Science Network TM Core Set"(WOS) was used as the American data source, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI) was used as the domestic data source. Using CiteSpace information visualization analysis software, this paper shows the co-occurrence and mutation of keywords in public health education in China and the United States in the past 30 years, and forms the knowledge map of co-citation analysis. Results Through keyword co-occurrence analysis, it was concluded that American research topics were related to knowledge attitude, education model and influence, education system, etc. And Chinese research topics were related to master of public health, talent training, training model, teaching reform, preventive medicine, etc. Through the co-citation analysis of the literature, we can grasp the frontier themes and hot spots of the United States in this period. Conclusion After the outbreak, China’s public health education should further strengthen system construction, strengthen practical teaching, and reform and improve the curriculum system and teaching methods of public health education.
作者 王楠 WANG Nan(Beijing Cancer Hospital)
出处 《医院管理论坛》 2021年第4期68-71,共4页 Hospital Management Forum
关键词 公共卫生 教育 中国 美国 可视化分析 Public health Education China The United States Visual analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献63

  • 1Kleinberg J.Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams.Proceedings of Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining(pp.91-101),Edmonton,Alberta,Canada:ACM Press,2002.
  • 2Freeman L C.Centrality in social networks:Conceptual clarification.Social Networks,1979,1:215-239.
  • 3Price D D.Networks of scientific papers.Science,1965,149:510-515.
  • 4van Raan A.On growth,ageing,and fractal differentiation of science.Scientometrics,2000,47(2):347-362.
  • 5Abt H A.Why some papers have long citation lifetimes.Nature,1998,395:756-757.
  • 6Bak P,Chen K.Self-organized criticality.Scientific American,1991,264(1):46-53.
  • 7Chen C,Morris S.Visualizing evolving networks:Minimum spanning trees versus pathfinder networks.Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization(pp.67-74),Seattle,Washington:IEEE Computer Society Press,2003.
  • 8Small H G,Griffith B C.The structure of scientific literatures i:Identifying and graphing specialties.Science Studies,1974,4:17-40.
  • 9Garfield E.Scientography:Mapping the tracks of science.Current Contents:Social & Behavioural Sciences,1994,7(45):5-10.
  • 10Garfield E H,S I,Torpie R J.The use of citation data in writing the history of science.Philadelphia:Institute for Scientific Information,1964.

共引文献1364

同被引文献43

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部