期刊文献+

中小学教师评价改革的基本取向 被引量:13

Basic Orientation of Teacher Evaluation Reform in Primary and Secondary School
下载PDF
导出
摘要 教师评价作为教育评价的重要组成部分,与教师发展密切相关。一定意义上,有怎样的教师评价,也就会有怎样的教师发展的生态格局,最终也就会有怎样的教师发展。针对当下中小学教师评价存在的阻碍教师发展的现象,要建设有助于中小学教师发展的良好生态,中小学教师评价改革应在弱化相对评价、非净效应评价、他人评价、顶线评价的同时,强化绝对评价、增值性评价、自主评价、底线评价。本文在检视处于强势地位的相对评价、非净效应评价、他人评价、顶线评价对中小学教师发展产生的不良影响的基础上,阐述了促进中小学教师发展的教师评价改革的相关主张。 As an important part of educational evaluation,teacher evaluation is closely related to teacher development.In a certain sense,what kind of teacher evaluation,there will be what kind of teacher development ecological pattern,and ultimately what kind of teacher development.Considering the problems that discourage teacher development in the system of evaluation in teachers from primary and secondary schools,it is necessary to build a good environment that contributes to teacher development.The teacher evaluation reform should strengthen absolute evaluation,value-added evaluation,self-evaluation and the bottom line evaluation while weakening relative evaluation,non net effect evaluation,others evaluation and top-line evaluation.On the basis of examining the negative influence primary and secondary school teachers,this article expounds the relevant propositions for teacher evaluation reforms that promote the development of teachers.
作者 吴全华 Wu Quanhua(South China Normal University)
出处 《当代教育科学》 北大核心 2021年第7期75-80,共6页 Contemporary Education Sciences
基金 广东省哲学社科学“十三五”规划2016年度一般项目“教育目的与教育手段关系的变革--以经验主义人性论为视角”(项目编号:GD16CJY03)的研究成果之一。
关键词 绝对评价 增值性评价 自主评价 底线评价 absolute evaluation value-added evaluation Self-evaluation the bottom line evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献48

  • 1Rivkin S. G., E. A. Hanushek, and J. F. Kain. Teachers, schools, and academic achievement [ J l- Econometrica, 2005, 73 (2) : 417 -458.
  • 2University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assess- ment Center. Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement [ R]. Knoxville, TN, 1996.
  • 3Sanders W. L., S. P. Wright, and S. P. Horn. Teach- er and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation [ J ]. Journal of Per- sonnel Evaluation in Education, 1997, 11 (1) : 57 -67.
  • 4Jason Millman. Grading teachers, grading schools : Is student achievement a valid evaluation measure [M]. Cor- win Press Ine, 1997.
  • 5Sanders, W. L. and S. P. Horn. The Tennessee value- added assessment system (TVAAS) : Mixed-model meth- odology in educational assessment [ J]. Journal of Person- nel Evaluation in Education, 1994, 8 (3) : 299 - 311.
  • 6Martineau J. A. Distorting value added: The use of longi- tudinal, vertically scaled student achievement data for growth-based, value-added accountability [ J ]. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2006, 31 ( 1 ) : 35 -62.
  • 7Sass T. R., A. Semykina, and D. N. Harris. Value- added models and the measurement of teacher productivity [ J ]. Economics of Education Review, 2014, 38 : 9 - 23.
  • 8Mariano L. T., D. F. McCaffrey, and J. Lockwood. A model for teacher effects from longitudinal data without as- suming vertical scaling [ J ]. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2010, 35 (3) : 253 - 279.
  • 9McCaffrey D. F. , et al. Models for value-added modeling of teacher effects [ J ]. Journal of Educational and Behav- ioral Statistics, 2004, 29 ( 1 ) : 67 - 101.
  • 10Lockwood J. , et al. Bayesian methods for scalable multi- variate value-added assessment [ J ]Journal of Educa- tional and Behavioral Statistics, 2007, 32 ( 2 ) : 125 - 150.

共引文献86

同被引文献109

引证文献13

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部