期刊文献+

Development and validation of an endoscopic images-based deep learning model for detection with nasopharyngeal malignancies 被引量:10

原文传递
导出
摘要 Background:Due to the occult anatomic location of the nasopharynx and frequent presence of adenoid hyperpla-sia,the positive rate for malignancy identification during biopsy is low,thus leading to delayed or missed diagnosis for nasopharyngeal malignancies upon initial attempt.Here,we aimed to develop an artificial intelligence tool to detect nasopharyngeal malignancies under endoscopic examination based on deep learning.Methods:An endoscopic images-based nasopharyngeal malignancy detection model(eNPM-DM)consisting of a fully convolutional network based on the inception architecture was developed and fine-tuned using separate training and validation sets for both classification and segmentation.Briefly,a total of 28,966 qualified images were collected.Among these images,27,536 biopsy-proven images from 7951 individuals obtained from January 1st,2008,to December 31st,2016,were split into the training,validation and test sets at a ratio of 7:1:2 using simple randomiza-tion.Additionally,1430 images obtained from January 1st,2017,to March 31st,2017,were used as a prospective test set to compare the performance of the established model against oncologist evaluation.The dice similarity coef-ficient(DSC)was used to evaluate the efficiency of eNPM-DM in automatic segmentation of malignant area from the background of nasopharyngeal endoscopic images,by comparing automatic segmentation with manual segmenta-tion performed by the experts.Results:All images were histopathologically confirmed,and included 5713(19.7%)normal control,19,107(66.0%)nasopharyngeal carcinoma(NPC),335(1.2%)NPC and 3811(13.2%)benign diseases.The eNPM-DM attained an overall accuracy of 88.7%(95%confidence interval(CI)87.8%-89.5%)in detecting malignancies in the test set.In the prospective comparison phase,eNPM-DM outperformed the experts:the overall accuracy was 88.0%(95%CI 86.1%-89.6%)vs.80.5%(95%CI 77.0%-84.0%).The eNPM-DM required less time(40 s vs.110.0±5.8 min)and exhibited encouraging performance in automatic segmentation of nasopharyngeal malignant area from the background,with an average DSC of 0.78±0.24 and 0.75±0.26 in the test and prospective test sets,respectively.Conclusions:The eNPM-DM outperformed oncologist evaluation in diagnostic classification of nasopharyngeal mass into benign versus malignant,and realized automatic segmentation of malignant area from the background of nasopharyngeal endoscopic images.
出处 《Cancer Communications》 SCIE 2018年第1期632-642,共11页 癌症通讯(英文)
基金 supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China[Grant Nos.81572665,81672680,81472525,81702873] the International Cooperation Project of Science and Technology Plan of Guangdong Province[Grant No.2016A050502011] the Health&Medical Collaborative Innovation Project of Guangzhou City,China(Grant No.201604020003).
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献62

  • 1宗井凤,马骏,唐玲珑,黄莹,刘立志,林爱华,崔念基,卢泰祥.鼻咽癌综合治疗策略研究——749例疗效分析[J].中国肿瘤,2005,14(8):538-542. 被引量:45
  • 2赵充,卢泰祥,韩非,卢丽霞,黄劭敏,邓小武,林承光,崔念基.139例鼻咽癌调强放疗的临床研究[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2006,15(1):1-6. 被引量:154
  • 3Fujiyoshi T, Watanabe T, Ichimiya I, Mogi G. Functional architecture of the nasopharyngeal tonsil. Am J OtolaryngoL 1989;10:124-31.
  • 4Vogler RC, li F J, Pilgram TK. Age-specific size of the normal adenoid pad on magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2000;25:392-85.
  • 5Wang MC, Tsai TL, Liu CY, Shu CH, Un CZ. Nasopharyngeal lymphoid hyperplasia of an HIV carrier, mimicking nasopharyngeal cancer. J Chin Med Assoc. 2003166:189-g'L.
  • 6Wei KR, Zheng RS, Zhang SW, Liang ZH, Ou ZX, Chen WQ. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma incidence and mortality in China in 2010. Chin J Cancer. 2014133:381-7.
  • 7King AD, Vlantis AC, Bhatia KS, Zee BC, Woo JK, Tse GM, et al. Primary nasopharyngeat carcinoma: diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging versus that of endoscopy and endoscopic biopsy. Radiology. 2011;258:53 +-7.
  • 8Bhatia KS, King AD, Vlantis AC, Ahuja AT, Tse GM. Nasopharyngeal mucosa and adenoids; appearance at MR imaging. Radiology. 2012;263:437-43.
  • 9King AD, Vlantis AC, "l'sang RK, Gary TM, Au AK, Chan CY, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006127:1288-91.
  • 10Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228-47.

共引文献64

同被引文献49

引证文献10

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部