期刊文献+

Quantitative analysis of CO_(2) embodiment in international trade:An overview of emerging literatures 被引量:5

原文传递
导出
摘要 The increasing volume of CO_(2) embodiment in international trade adds a layer of complexity to environmental policies and has raised arguments on the traditional production based responsibility for CO_(2) emissions.In order to help understand the quantity of CO_(2) embodiment in trade and its policy implications,this paper gives observations to recently emerging literatures that quantitatively discuss CO_(2) embodiment in trade.The analytical approaches share the principle of using input and output modeling but vary dramatically in study boundary and estimation accuracy.The calculations can be roughly categorized into three types:direct quantification of CO_(2) embodiments in multiregional trade,direct quantification of CO_(2) embodiment in bilateral trade,and indirect analysis by comparing the scenarios with or without trade.The practical estimations strongly rely on trade partner selection and data availability.An obvious imbalance of net CO_(2) embodiment in the commodity trade between major developed countries and developing economies as a whole was confirmed by these literatures.Carbon taxes and other possible limitations on CO_(2) emissions have been addressed.The consistency across the calculations could be enhanced by systematic analyses in more detail to convince the international community to take binding commitments for the reduction of global CO_(2) emissions.
出处 《Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering》 SCIE EI CSCD 2009年第1期12-19,共8页 环境科学与工程前沿(英文)
  • 相关文献

同被引文献78

  • 1夏玉军.国内简讯[J].国外城市规划,2005,20(3):84-85. 被引量:1
  • 2马涛,陈家宽.中国工业产品国际贸易的污染足迹分析[J].中国环境科学,2005,25(4):508-512. 被引量:35
  • 3Iwaro J, Mwasha A. A review of building energy regulation and policy for energy conservation in developing countries [ J ]. Energy Policy ,2010,38 (12) :7744 - 7755.
  • 4Garnaut R. The Garnaut Climate Change Review [ R ]. Melbourne : Cambridge University Press,200$.
  • 5Foliente G. Developments in performance-based building codes and standards [ J ]. Forest Products Journal,2000,50 ( 7/8 ) : 11 - 21.
  • 6Johansson B. Climate policy instruments and industry-effects and potential responses in the Swedish context [ J ]. Energy Policy, 2006,34( 15 ) :2344 - 2360.
  • 7Goulder L, Parry I. Instrument choice in environmental policy [ J ]. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2008,2 (2) :152-174.
  • 8Galinato GI, Yoder JK. An integrated tax-subsidy policy forcarbon emission reduction [J].Resource and Energy Economics, 2010,32(3) :310 - 326.
  • 9Koeppel S, Vorsatz D. Assessment of Policy Instruments for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Buildings [ M ]. Budapest: Central European University,2007.
  • 10Birner S,Martinot E. The GEF Energy-efficient Product Portfolio: Emerging Experience and Lessons [ R ]. Washington DC : Global Environment Facility ,2002.

引证文献5

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部