航空器“流押契约”的正当性及立法路径的选择

The Legitimacy and the Choice of Legislative Path of the Aircraft“Fluidity Contract”

流押契约禁止的立法目的需要修正,其已经不能完全满足现实需要,流押契约对债务人(抵押人)未必会造成不利益,其本身的一些积极价值需要重新评估和重视。航空器流押契约的存在具有必要性,是强化债权人利益保护、增强债权人融资信心的需要,是私法自治原则的落实、符合法律的效益价值追求。因此,我国立法应顺应时代的立法趋势,确认航空器流押契约的效力,同时建议通过引入一个特殊的撤销权对其潜在的消极效应予以抑制。

The legislative purpose of the prohibition of the fluidity contract needs to be amended,as it no longer fully meets the practical needs.The fluidity contract may not cause disadvantages to the debtor(mortgagor),and its own positive values need to be evaluated again.The existence of aircraft fluidity contract is necessary,which can strengthen the protection of the interests of creditors and enhance the confidence of creditors in financing.It is the implementation of the principle of private law autonomy and is consistent with the pursuit of benefit value of the law.Therefore,China should follow the contemporary legislative trend,confirm the effectiveness of aircraft fluidity contract,and propose to introduce a special rescission to curb its potential negative effects.