摘要
政府间合作成为当前我国公共管理实践的重要现象,在一定程度上改变了我国地方政府间以竞争为主的关系现状。为实现食品安全和脱贫攻坚的“双赢”,绩效目标差异的两地在食品监管领域基于监管人员和监管工具合作的不同组合,形成了合作程度不同的合作模式,如综合型合作、信息型合作、实体型合作与消费型合作等。基于“成本—收益”的分析思路,研究发现,历史合作关系和现实财政联系产生了合作的直接成本和间接成本,而示范称号的获得与负面事件的发生传递出不同性质的符号,改变了两地开展合作的收益预期,上述四点变化影响了两地合作的可能性和合作的程度。研究地方政府监管合作的动机,可以为压力型体制下我国地方政府行为趋势研究提供边际贡献,为接下来开展的乡村振兴东西部协作提供前瞻。
Inter-governmental cooperation,serving as an important phenomenon in the public administration in China,has changed,to a certain extent,the competition oriented relationship between local governments.Two local governments with different performance objectives but a common target to achieve a win-win results on food safety and poverty alleviation,cooperate with models,such as comprehensive cooperation,information-based cooperation,entity-based cooperation and consumption cooperation,different in degree of food supervision based on different combinations of supervisors and supervision tools.This paper,based on the analysis of“cost-benefit”,finds that the historical cooperative relationship and the real financial connection produce the direct and indirect costs of cooperation,while the acquisition of the model title and the occurrence of negative events convey different symbols changing the income expectation of the cooperation.Changes of such sort at length decide the possibility and degree of their cooperation.The research on the motivation of local government cooperation on supervision provides marginal contribution for the research on the behavior trend of local government in China under the pressure system,and offers a perspective for cooperation between China’s east and west regions on the next stage of rural revitalization.
作者
刘志鹏
LIU Zhi-peng(School of Government,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)
出处
《广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2021年第3期28-39,共12页
Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基金
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助“政府注意力研究”(2019NTSS36)。
关键词
食品安全监管
跨区域政府间合作
成本—收益
乡村振兴
治理现代化
food safety supervision
cross-regional inter-governmental cooperation
cost-benefit
rural revitalization
governance modernization