期刊文献+

论劝导游戏及其对劝导技术伦理困境的超越 被引量:1

On Persuasive Games and Their Transcendence over the Ethical Dilemmas of Persuasive Technology
原文传递
导出
摘要 劝导游戏是利用“程序修辞”的方法去立论进而改变玩家态度和行为的电脑游戏和技术人工物。其中,程序修辞指的是劝导游戏通过“过程表征”去刻画和表达驱动现实事物或系统如何运作的方法和逻辑(即程序性);该表达是以三段论省略式的形式立论的,玩家通过与游戏程序的交互从而填补省略式缺失的前提(即修辞性)。由于劝导游戏是劝导技术应用于电脑游戏后的结果,那么也极有可能会引发与劝导技术类似的侵权和操控伦理困境。劝导游戏试图从两方面超越上述困境:用过程表征等内容建构游戏世界,并把游戏世界作为玩家后续进入现实世界的实验室和缓冲带;利用程序修辞为设计师和玩家提供了一个沟通对话与民主协商的机制和平台。 Persuasive games are the media and technological artifacts using“procedural rhetoric”to make arguments in order to change the attitudes and behaviors of players.Procedural rhetoric means that persuasive games describe and express the way and logic that drive real things or systems to work through“procedural representation”(viz.procedurality);the expressions are made in the form of enthymeme,and players interact with game programs to fill in the missing premise(viz.rhetoricity).As the outcome of persuasive technology applied to computer games,persuasive games may also cause the ethical dilemmas of infringement and manipulation like those happened in persuasive technology.Persuasive games try to transcend these dilemmas from two aspects:using procedural representation and other contents to construct game worlds and taking game worlds as the laboratory and buffer zone that allow players to subsequently enter the real world;procedural rhetoric providing a mechanism and platform for game designers and players to communicate,dialogue and negotiate democratically.
作者 吴一迪 WU Yi-di(School of Marxism,Shanghai University of Electric Power,Shanghai 200090,China)
出处 《科学技术哲学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第4期86-92,共7页 Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目“技术创新哲学与中国自主创新的实践逻辑研究”(19ZDA040) 国家社会科学基金“技术创新的实践哲学研究”(16BZX025)。
关键词 劝导游戏 程序修辞 过程表征 劝导技术 道德物化 persuasive games procedural rhetoric procedural representation persuasive technology Materializing Morality
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献13

  • 1[美]唐·伊德.让事物“说话”[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2008.
  • 2Peter--Paul Verbeek, Ambient Intelligence and Persuasive Technology: The Blurring Boundaries Between Human and Technology, Nanoethlcs, (2009) 3:231-242.
  • 3Fogg. B. J. , Persuasive Computers: Perspectives and Research Directions, Proceedings of the CHI, New York: ACM Press, 1998, pp. 225-232.
  • 4Fogg. B. J. , Persuasive Technology : Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do, San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2003 : 5.
  • 5Peter--Paul verbeek, What Things Do. The Pennsylvania State. The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2005, p. 212.
  • 6Peter--Paul verbeek, Acting Artifacts.. the Technological Mediation of Action, User Behavior and Technology Development, 2006, Part 1, pp. 53-60.
  • 7Winner. Do Artifacts Have Politics?, in The Whale and the Reactor : A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986, pp. 19--39.
  • 8Persuasive technology and social values [EB/OL]. (2009-01-12)[2011-03-17]. http://www, ethicsandtechnology. eu/research/projects/persuasive technology_and social_ values/.
  • 9顾磊.劝导技术及其设计评估的分析[J].电脑知识与技术,2008,3(9):1460-1461. 被引量:3
  • 10朱勤.技术中介理论:一种现象学的技术伦理学思路[J].科学技术哲学研究,2010,27(1):101-106. 被引量:22

共引文献15

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部