期刊文献+

云南漾濞6.4级地震强地面运动三要素基本特征分析 被引量:1

Basic characteristics of the three elements of strong ground motion of the Yangbi M6.4 earthquake in Yunnan Province
下载PDF
导出
摘要 2021年5月21日云南漾濞发生6.4级地震,中国数字化强震动观测网络在主震中捕获28组加速度数据。对84条三分向加速度记录进行常规处理,计算出对应的地震动参数,并绘制震中附近水平向PGA和PGV等值线图,结果显示其走向和形态与震后烈度调查结果相近。将实际观测的相对持时进行曲线回归,求得相关系数,并据此计算出Td(5%~95%)持时对应的震源持续时间在10.22~13.06 s间,与震源破裂过程反演结果基本一致。再通过分析近场6个台站记录的加速度反应谱,并与抗震设计谱比较,总结此次地震的频谱特性,为该区域抗震设防提供参考依据。 On May 21,2021,an M6.4 earthquake occurred at Yangbi county,Yunnan Province.28 groups of acceleration data were obtained by the CDSMON.In this paper,84 three-component acceleration records were processed,and corresponding ground motion parameters were calculated.Horizontal PGA and PGV contour maps near the epicenter were drawn,and the results showed that the trend and shape are similar to the results of post-earthquake intensity survey.The corresponding source duration of Td(5%-95%)is between 10.22 s and 13.06 s,which is basically consistent with the inversion results of source rupture process.To summarize the spectrum characteristics of the earthquake,the acceleration response spectra recorded by six typical stations were analyzed and compared with the seismic design spectrum.The study results can provide a reference for seismic fortification in the study area.
作者 田文通 董建华 杨博 赵律华 TIAN Wentong;DONG Jianhua;YANG Bo;ZHAO Lühua(School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu, China;Key Laboratory of Loess Earthquake Engineering, CEA, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, China)
出处 《地震工程学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2021年第4期760-766,共7页 China Earthquake Engineering Journal
基金 中国地震局地震科技星火计划(XH18049SX) 中国地震局地震预测研究所基本科研业务费项目(2017IESLZ06,2019IESLZ04)。
关键词 漾濞6.4级地震 时程曲线 反应谱 Yangbi M6.4 earthquake time-history curve response spectrum
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献33

  • 1谢礼立,王海云.近场地震学中3个术语译名的商榷[J].地震工程与工程振动,2005,25(6):198-200. 被引量:4
  • 2俞言祥,汪素云.中国东部和西部地区水平向基岩加速度反应谱衰减关系[J].震灾防御技术,2006,1(3):206-217. 被引量:93
  • 3雷建成,高孟潭,俞言祥.四川及邻区地震动衰减关系[J].地震学报,2007,29(5):500-511. 被引量:87
  • 4BOORE David. Effect of baseline corrections on displacements and response spectra for several recordings of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2001, 91(5): 1199-1211.
  • 5STRASSER F O and BOMMER J J. Review: Strong Ground Motions—Have We Seen the Worst[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2009, 99(5): 2613-2637.
  • 6GB/T17742 中国地震烈度表[S]. 2008.
  • 7KALKAN Erol, KUNNATH Sashi.Effects of fling step and forward directivity on seismic response of buildings[J].Earthquake Spectra, 2006, 22(2):367-390.
  • 8BINDI D, LUZI L, MASSA M,et al. Horizontal and vertical ground motion prediction equations derived from the Italian Accelerometric Archive (ITACA). Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2010, 8(5):1209-1230.
  • 9HOUSNER Geogre. Intensity of ground motion during strong earthquakes. Second technical report[R].California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, August 1952.
  • 10MASI Angelo,CHIAUZZI Leonardo,BRAGA Franco, et al. Peak and integral seismic parameters of L’Aquila 2009 ground motions: observed versus code provision values[J].Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2011,9(1):139-156.

共引文献83

同被引文献38

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部