期刊文献+

“路怒症”的内外生逻辑及影响因素研究 被引量:3

Study on endogenous and exogenous logic and influencing factors of“road rage”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为探索“路怒症”的内外生逻辑,运用调查问卷数据,采用灰色关联分析法从即时和长期2方面对引发路怒的原因进行分析。结果表明:在引发路怒的即时原因中,前车或其他车随意变换车道或调头、其他车辆插队或加塞、夜间行驶开远光灯是最重要的3个原因;在引发路怒的长期原因中,工作或生活压力大最易引发路怒。运用Logistic回归分析各主要路怒原因的易发驾驶人群,据此提出针对性建议,以促进城市交通安全有效治理。 In order to explore the endogenous and exogenous logic of“road rage”,the data of questionnaire survey was used to analyze the causes of road rage from both immediate and long-term perspectives by using the grey relational analysis.The results showed that among the immediate causes of road rage,the vehicle in front or other vehicles randomly change lanes or make a U-turn,other vehicles cut in line or jump the queue,and turn on high beams at night were the three most important causes.In the long-term causes of road rage,the large work or life pressure was most likely to trigger the road rage.The Logistic regression was further used to analyze the prone driving crowds of the main causes of road rage,and the targeted suggestions were put forward to promote the effective management of urban traffic safety.
作者 任倩文 卢昕玮 赵妍 汤子帆 吴会珍 REN Qianwen;LU Xinwei;ZHAO Yan;TANG Zifan;WU Huizhen(School of Economics and Management,Chang’An University,Xi’an Shaanxi 710064,China;College of Transportation Engineering,Chang’An University,Xi’an Shaanxi 710064,China)
出处 《中国安全生产科学技术》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2021年第7期162-166,共5页 Journal of Safety Science and Technology
关键词 路怒症 内外生逻辑 影响因素 灰色关联 LOGISTIC回归 road rage endogenous and exogenous logic influencing factor grey correlation Logistic regression
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献99

  • 1严利鑫,吴超仲,高嵩,马晓凤,侯萍.驾驶人个体因素对驾驶愤怒情绪影响关系研究[J].交通信息与安全,2013,31(6):119-124. 被引量:22
  • 2袁双宏,孙启凯.出租车交通事故及其驾驶员心理分析[J].湖南农机,2014(1):131-132. 被引量:2
  • 3李凤芝,李昌吉,龙云芳,詹承烈,姚武,唐海丰,靳辉.攻击性驾驶行为与单胺氧化酶A基因多态性的关系[J].中华预防医学杂志,2004,38(5):321-323. 被引量:1
  • 4Deffenbacher J L,Lynch R S,Oetting E R. The driving anger expression inventory:A measure of how people express their anger on the road[J].{H}Behaviour Research and Therapy,2002,(06):717-737.
  • 5NHTSA. Traffic safety facts 2007:a compilation of motor vehicle crash data from the fatality analysis reporting system and the general estimates system[R].Washington DC:National Highway Traffic Safety Administration,2007.32-43.
  • 6Centre for Accident Research and Road Safety. State of the road:A fact sheet of the centre for accident research and road safety-Queensland[EB/OL].http://www.carrsq.qnt.edu.au/publications/corporate/aggressive_ driving _ fs.pdf,2009,2013.
  • 7Maxwell J P,Grant S,Lipkin S. Further validation of the propensity for angry driving scale in British drivers[J].Pers Individual Differ,2005,(38):213-224.
  • 8Bj(o)rklund,Gunilla M. Driver irritation and aggressive behavior[J].{H}Accident Analysis and Prevention,2008,(05):1069-1077.
  • 9Deffenbacher J L,Huff M E,Lynch R S. Characteristics and treatment of high-anger drivers[J].{H}Journal of Consulting Psychology,2000,(06):15-17.
  • 10Fong G, Frost D, Stansfeld S. Road Rage: a Psychiatric Phenom enon T-J:. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 2001 36(6) :277-286.

共引文献45

同被引文献24

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部