科学论证取向下的试题设计及教学应对——以分析高考试题的设计为例被引量：2

导出

摘要基于《普通高中物理课程标准(2017年版)》,诠释了科学论证内涵及论证模型,梳理了科学论证取向的高考试题的设计,包括关注过程,经历完整的论证体验;强调环节,考查论证要素的形成;聚焦反驳,考查论证思维的慎密等,提炼了开展合作论证学习,经历知识建构过程;设置论证问题,合理解构难点;捕捉反驳时机,引发论证思维碰撞等实际教学策略.

作者刘伟

机构地区浙江省龙游中学

出处《物理教师》 CAS 北大核心 2021年第7期78-81,共4页 Physics Teacher

基金衢州市教育科学规划2020年度重点立项项目“基于习题教学的科学思维进阶路径研究”(课题编号:QZ21020)研究成果。

关键词科学论证试题设计证据观点反驳

分类号 G633.7 [文化科学—教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献3

1马亚鹏.科学论证在我国课程政策中的历史演进——以高中物理课程标准(教学大纲)为例[J].物理教师,2019,40(3):7-10. 被引量：15
2任红艳,李广洲.图尔敏论证模型在科学教育中的研究进展[J].外国中小学教育,2012(9):28-34. 被引量：42
3韩葵葵,胡卫平.科学论证能力结构模型建构研究[J].教育理论与实践,2019,39(22):3-7. 被引量：26

二级参考文献29

1Osborne J. Arguing to Learn in Science: The Role of Collaborative, Critical Discourse. Science,2010,328(4): 463-466.
2Norris, S. P., Phillips, L. M. et al.Learning to Read Scientific Text: Do Elementary School Commercial Reading Programs Help? Science Education, 2008,92(5):765-798.
3Kuhn D. Science asArgument:Implications for Teaching and Learning Scientific Thinking. Science education, 1993,77(3): 319-337.
4Driver, R., Newton, P. et al. Establishing the Norms of Scientific Argumentation in Classrooms. Science Education, 2000,84 (3):287-313.
5Romberg. T. A., Carpenter, T. P. Research on Teaching and Learning Mathematics: Two Disciplines of Scientific Enquiry. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.),Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.),New York: Macmillan, 1986:605-629.
6Hake R. R. Interactive-engagement versus Traditional Methods: A Six-thousand-student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses American Journal of Physics, 1998,66(1):64-74.
7Schwarz B.B., Neuman Y., et al. Two Wrongs May Make a Right ... If They Argue Together! Cognition and Instruction, 2000,18(4):461-494.
8Ames G. J., Murray F.B. When Two Wrongs Make a Right: Promoting Cognitive Change by Social Conflict. Developmental Psychology, 1982,18(6):894-897.
9Zohar A., Nemet F. Fostering Students' Knowledge and Argumentation Skills through Dilemmas in Human Genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2002,39(1):35-62.
10Cole R., Becker N. et al. Adapting a Methodology from Mathematics Education Research to Chemistry Education Research: Documenting Collective Activity Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, Accepted.