期刊文献+

论对特殊目的并购公司的监管路径选择 被引量:5

On the Choice of Supervision Path for Special Purpose Acquisition Companies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 特殊目的并购公司(Special Purpose Acquisition Company)是美国证券交易委员会所认定的某种特殊类型的空白支票公司,可以通过这种公司实施跨境反向并购来帮助其并购目标企业实现在美国证券交易所上市。2020年至2021年一季度,通过SPAC模式在美国上市的企业数量呈现井喷式增长,这一趋势引起了美国证券监管机构的密切关注。在此背景下,美国证券交易委员会在早期仍然坚持以"信息披露"为主的监管要求,后期逐渐走向通过发布指南、声明等方式进行实体性监管,而亚洲一些国家如新加坡也对SPAC模式非常感兴趣,新加坡证券交易所在其SPAC模式的咨询文件中则选择了较美国而言更为严格的实体性监管模式。 A Special Purpose Acquisition Company(SPAC)is a special type of blank check company recognized by the U.S.Securities and Exchange Commission(SEC).It can help its acquisition target companies to achieve the goal of listing on the U.S.stock exchange through implementing the cross-border reverse acquisition.From 2020 to the first quarter of 2021,the number of companies listed on the U.S.stock exchange through the SPAC model showed a blow-out growth,which has aroused the close attention of SEC.Under this context,SEC still adhered to the regulatory requirements based on the"information disclosure"in the early stage,and gradually moved towards the substantive regulation through the issuance of guidelines,statements,and so on.Some Asian countries such as Singapore also take to the SPAC model,and Singapore Exchange chose a more stringent substantive supervision model in its consultation paper on the SPAC model than the United States.
作者 王岚岚 WANG Lan-lan(College of Economics,Hainan University,Haikou 570228,China)
出处 《海南大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2021年第4期167-176,共10页 Journal of Hainan University (Humanities & Social Sciences)
基金 海南省哲学社会科学基地课题(JD(ZC)20-15) 海南省教育厅高等学校科研项目(Hnky2021-11)。
关键词 SPAC 信息披露 实体性监管 安全港制度 系统性风险 SPAC information disclosure substantive supervision statutory safe harbor systemic risks
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献31

  • 1谷耀,陆丽娜.沪、深、港股市信息溢出效应与动态相关性——基于DCC-(BV)EGARCH-VAR的检验[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2006,23(8):142-151. 被引量:121
  • 2Schwarcz,S.L.Systemic RiskResearch Paper SeriesNo,2008.
  • 3Haldane,A.G.Rethinking the financial network,2009.
  • 4Roubini,Nouriel.Crisis Economics![J]. The International Economy . 2010 (2)
  • 5FSB,BIS,IMF.Guidance to Assess the Systemic Important of Financial Institution, Markets and Instruments Initial Considerations-----Background Paper.. http://www. bis. org/publ/othp07. pdf . 2009
  • 6IMF,BIS,FSB."Guidance to Assess the Systemic Importance of Financial Institutions,Markets and Instruments:Initial Considerations". Report to G20 Finance Ministers and Governors . 2009
  • 7Steven L Schwarcz."Systemic Risk". The Georgetown Law Journal . 2008
  • 8International Monetary Fund.Global Financial Stability Report. http://www.imf.org/External/Pubs/FT/GFSR/2009/01/pdf/text.pdf . 2009
  • 9Lo A W Hedge Funds.Systemic Risk, and the Financial Crisis of2007-2008:Written Testimony for the House Oversight Committee Hearing on HedgeFunds. Systemic Risk, and the Financial Crisis of 2007 . 2008
  • 10Marcin Kacperczyk,Philipp Schnabl.When Safe Proved Risky:Commercial Paper during the Financial Crisis of 2007-2009. Journal of Econometrics . 2010

同被引文献25

引证文献5

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部