摘要
认罪认罚从宽制度中值班律师制度是推动其司法适用的重要环节,但对于值班律师的角色定位尚存争议,现阶段有辩护人说、见证人说和法律帮助者说三种观点。辩护人说的观点增加了值班律师的工作负担,并且和值班律师的报酬不成正比,反而会降低认罪认罚从宽制度的效率。见证人说的观点过分限缩值班律师的工作内容,不利于值班律师的作用发挥和其自身的学习发展。法律帮助者说的观点较为折中,能够涵盖工作范围且符合工作初衷,并且有助于差异化的法律帮助制度的构建。
The duty lawyer system is an important link to promote its judicial application in the leniency system of pleading guilty and punishment,but there are still controversies about the role of duty lawyer.At present,there are three views:defender,witness and legal helper.The point of view of the defender increases the workload of the lawyer on duty,and is not proportional to the remuneration of the lawyer on duty.On the contrary,it will reduce the efficiency of the leniency system of pleading guilty.The viewpoint of witness theory excessively limits the work content of lawyers on duty,which is not conducive to the role of lawyers on duty and their own learning and development.The view of legal aid is a compromise,which can cover the scope of work and accord with the original intention of the work,and help to build a differentiated legal aid system.
作者
尹航
王金雨
陈禹衡
YIN Hang;WANG Jin-yu;CHEN Yu-heng(School of Law,Shandong University,Weihai 264209,China;Shandong Higher People's Court,Jinan,Shandong 250000,China;School of Law,Southeast University Jiangsu,Nanjing 211189,China)
出处
《红河学院学报》
2021年第4期128-131,共4页
Journal of Honghe University
基金
国家重点研发计划:面向诉讼全流程的一体化便民服务技术及装备研究(2018YFC0830200)暨江苏高校“青蓝工程”资助成果
山东省社会科学规划研究重点项目:认罪认罚从宽司法改革疑难问题研究(18BFXJ04)。
