摘要
由于国内“唯实证”和“主思辨”的争论尤烈,文章针对农业教育领域重要期刊在2019-2020年间发表的748篇科研论文所运用分析方法的调查研究发现:农业教育重要期刊发表的科研论文所运用的研究方法呈现出较显著差异;从变化趋势来看,国际期刊农业教育研究方法的类型未发生比较显著的变化,而国内某些农业教育期刊所运用的研究方法类型则呈现出了较显著的变化。建议积极推进智慧农业教育实证研究;发展各种类型的实证研究,以保持实证研究类别的多样性;确保思辨研究能运用最严谨、最精准、最简洁的学术语言来阐述科学的观点。
Aiming at the fierce disputes between"empirical only"and"speculation"in China,this paper investigates the analytical methods used in the 748 scientific research papers published by important journals in the field of agricultural education during years 2019-2020 and found that the research methodology used in the research papers published in important journals of agricultural education are greatly different;from the perspective of variation trends,the types of agricultural education research methodology in international journals have not undergone significant changes,while the types of research methodology used in certain domestic agricultural education journals have shown more significant changes.It is suggested that we should actively promote the empirical research of intelligent agricultural education and develop various types of empirical research,so as to maintain the diversity of empirical research categories and ensure that speculative research can use the most rigorous,accurate and concise academic language to express scientific viewpoints.
出处
《智慧农业导刊》
2021年第4期52-55,共4页
JOURNAL OF SMART AGRICULTURE
关键词
教育研究
研究方法
比较研究
智慧农业
创新应用
educational research
research methodology
comparative research
smart agriculture
innovative application