期刊文献+

提高林业资源监管成效的制度思考 被引量:11

Institutional Thinking on Improving the Effectiveness of Forestry Resources Supervision
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国林业资源保护制度建设宏观指导多,微观规范少。林业资源生态补偿过度依赖政府的作用,在生态恢复实践中,缺乏必要且具体的制度支撑以及市场途径实现的规范和规定。分析了林业资源监督管理现状及存在问题,提出在加强林业资源补偿、生态税收法制化、重大风险预判和防范、完善群众参与林业资源保护的同时,完善林业资源保护地役权制度、建立林业资源生态补偿银行制度、碳汇交易制度,从创新管理制度和开拓市场途径两个方面着力,提高林业资源监管成效。 The development of forestry resources protection system in China has more macroscopic guidance and less microcosmic norms.Ecological compensation for forestry resources is excessively dependent on the role of the government.In the practice of ecological restoration,there is a lack of necessary and specific institutional support as well as norms and regulations for the realization of market approaches.This paper analyzed status quo and existing problems of the forestry resources supervision and management,put forward the proposals including strengthening forestry resources compensation,ecological tax legal system,anticipation and prevention of significant risks,promoting the masses participation in forestry resources protection,meanwhile,improving the system of forestry resource conservation easement,establishing the forestry resources ecological compensation bank system,and carbon trading system.Efforts should be made to improve the effectiveness of forestry resources supervision from two aspects:innovating management system and expanding market channels.
作者 郭菊兰 高日 柴岐珍 高尚仁 GUO Julan;GAO Ri;CHAI Qizhen;GAO Shangren(Institute of Wetland Research,Chinese Academy of Forestry,Beijing 100091,China;Shanxi Provincial Poplar Bureau Xuejiazhuang Forest Farm,Shuozhou,Shanxi 036002,China;Office of the Commissioner in Shanghai,National Forestry and Grassland Administration,Shanghai 200040,China)
出处 《林业资源管理》 北大核心 2021年第3期9-13,共5页 Forest Resources Management
基金 林业和草原软科学研究项目(20201301008)。
关键词 林业资源 监督管理 制度创新 市场途径 forestry resources supervision and management system innovation market approach
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献33

  • 1吕忠梅.论环境使用权交易制度[J].政法论坛,2000,18(4):126-135. 被引量:111
  • 2CarbonmarkelsafterCopenhagen. TheEconomist. February,4th. 2010.
  • 3JeffreyM Hirsch, EmissionsAllowanceTradingUnderTheClearAirAct: AModelForFutureEnvironmentalRegulations?, 7, N Y. U ENVIRONMENTALLAWJOURNAL, 352,383(1999).
  • 4Europe' sCarbonTradingMarketSeesBriskBusiness, http://www .npr. org/templates/story/ story.php? storyId= 10716772,Jule,5th,2007.
  • 5《欧盟排放大户受惠于碳交易计划.人民网环保频道.http://env.people.com.cn/GB/11122329.html.2010年3月11日.
  • 6JeffreyM. Hirsch, EmissionsAllowanceTradingUnderTheClearAirAct: AModelForFutureEnvironmentalRegulations?, 7, N. Y. U. ENVIRONMENTALLAWJOURNAL, 352,378(1999).
  • 7DennyEnerman, theEU' sEmissionsTradingScheme: APrototypeGlobalSystem, MIT- Joint ProgramontheScienceandPlolicyogfGlobalC hangeReportN O. 170.Februany2009.
  • 8Larson J S. Rapid assessment of wetlands: history and application to management [A]//Mitsch W J. Global Wetlands: Old World and New [C]. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1994: 625-636.
  • 9Dalland Q. Preservation of Nature and Local Economic Activity - Conflict or Mutual Interests? [J]. Geoforum, 1978, 9(1): 49-81.
  • 10Dessylas M D. The Adaptation of the Social and Structural Policyof the EEC to the Changed Market Situation: The Protection of the Countryside [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1990(18): 197-201.

共引文献35

同被引文献44

引证文献11

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部