期刊文献+

集束化营养干预对非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者营养状况和生存质量的影响

Effect of bundle nutrition intervention on nutritional status and quality of life in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨集束化营养干预措施对非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)患者营养状况和生存质量的影响。方法84例NHL化疗患者,应用随机数字表法分为研究组和对照组,每组42例。两组化疗方案一致,对照组给予常规饮食指导,研究组在对照组基础上实施集束化营养干预措施。比较两组入院时和化疗后的营养状况及生存质量。结果化疗后,两组有营养风险占比比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),研究组患者血清白蛋白(ALB)(31.6±3.7)g/L、前白蛋白(PA)(0.30±0.06)g/L、血红蛋白(Hb)(11.4±2.2)g/dl、总淋巴细胞计数(TLC)(1.56±0.44)×109/L均高于对照组的(28.4±4.5)g/L、(0.23±0.04)g/L、(9.6±2.6)g/dl、(1.35±0.42)×109/L,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。化疗后,研究组患者生理领域评分(60.2±5.0)分、心理领域评分(61.2±5.2)分、社会关系领域评分(58.6±5.2)分、环境领域评分(59.6±4.2)分、总评分(59.8±5.3)分均高于对照组的(55.4±4.6)、(57.3±4.8)、(54.4±5.1)、(55.4±4.8)、(56.2±4.5)分,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论集束化营养干预能改善非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者营养状况和生存质量。 Objective To discuss the effect of bundle nutrition intervention on nutritional status and quality of life in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma(NHL).Methods A total of 84 patients with NHL were divided into study group and control group according to random numerical table,with 42 cases in each group.The chemotherapy regimens in the two groups were the same.The control group received routine diet guidance,and the research group received bundle nutrition intervention based on the control group.The nutritional status and quality of life of the two groups at admission and after chemotherapy were compared.Results After chemotherapy,there was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of nutritional risks between the two groups(P>0.05).The serum albumin(ALB)(31.6±3.7)g/L,prealbumin(PA)(0.30±0.06)g/L,hemoglobin(Hb)(11.4±2.2)g/dl,total lymphocyte count(TLC)(1.56±0.44)×109/L of the research group were higher than(28.4±4.5)g/L,(0.23±0.04)g/L,(9.6±2.6)g/dl,(1.35±0.42)×109/L of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).After chemotherapy,the physiological field score(60.2±5.0)points,psychological field score(61.2±5.2)points,social relationship field score(58.6±5.2)points,environmental field score(59.6±4.2)points and total score(59.8±5.3)points of the research group were higher than(55.4±4.6),(57.3±4.8),(54.4±5.1),(55.4±4.8),(56.2±4.5)points of the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Bundle nutrition intervention can significantly improve the nutritional status and quality of life of patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
作者 魏华丽 叶玉蝶 WEI Hua-li;YE Yu-die(Department of Hematology,Huizhou Municipal Central Hospital,Huizhou 516001,China)
出处 《中国实用医药》 2021年第21期4-7,共4页 China Practical Medicine
基金 惠州市科技计划项目(项目编号:2018Y007)。
关键词 集束化营养干预 非霍奇金淋巴瘤 生存质量 营养状况 Bundle nutrition intervention Non-Hodgkin lymphoma Quality of life Nutritional status
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献130

  • 1肖畅,苏祖兰,吴秋良,郜红艺,方建晨,夏忠军,管忠震.根据WHO新分类对493例非霍奇金淋巴瘤的临床病理分析[J].中华病理学杂志,2005,34(1):22-27. 被引量:54
  • 2Guo-Hao Wu Zhong-Hua Liu Zhao-Han Wu Zhao-Guang Wu.Perioperative artificial nutrition in malnourished gastrointestinal cancer patients[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2006,12(15):2441-2444. 被引量:30
  • 3程月新,徐卫,李建勇,钱思轩,陆化,吴汉新,陈丽娟.非霍奇金淋巴瘤641例临床分析[J].南京医科大学学报(自然科学版),2006,26(9):837-840. 被引量:15
  • 4周立强,孙燕,谭文勇,李陶,王琦路,冯凤仪,王金万,储大同,石远凯,李晔雄,孙云田,吕宁.非霍奇金淋巴瘤1125例临床病理分析[J].癌症进展,2006,4(5):391-397. 被引量:47
  • 5Orley J. Quality of Life Assessment: International Perspectives [R ]. Sprin ger Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1994
  • 6World Health Organization. WHOQOL user manual[S]. Geneya: WHO,1998
  • 7Korl AD, le Gessie S, Snijder S, et al. Primary extranodal non- Hodgkin' s lymphoma (NHL): the impact of alternative defini- tions tested in the Comprehensive Cancer Centre West popula- tion-based NHL registry. Ann Oncol, 2003, 14:131-139.
  • 8Li XQ, Li GD, Gao ZF, et al. The relative frequencies of lympho- ma subtypes in China: a nationwide study of 10002 cases by the Chinese Lymphoma Study Group. Ann Oncol, 2011, 22 Suppl 4: ivl41.
  • 9Fisher RI, Gaynor ER, Dahlberg S, et al. Comparison of a stan- dard regimen (CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy regi- mens for advanced non-Hodgkin' s lymphoma. N Engl J Med, 1993, 328:1002-1006.
  • 10Reyes F, Lepage E, Ganem G, et al. ACVBP versus CHOP plus radiotherapy for localized aggressive lymphoma. N Engl J Med, 2005, 352:1197-1205.

共引文献5778

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部