期刊文献+

CPTPP跨境服务贸易负面清单的比较与借鉴 被引量:6

Comparison and Reference of the Negative List of CPTPP Cross-border Service Trade
原文传递
导出
摘要 采用负面清单对跨境服务贸易进行管理已成为全球的发展趋势。中国将尝试在中韩FTA、中澳FTA中采用负面清单对跨境服务贸易进行管理,未来在双边、多边区域贸易协定中采用负面清单进行谈判也是必然之势。CPTPP代表了全球投资贸易规则的高水平实践,本文分析了CPTPP跨境服务贸易部分的内容以及成员国在附件Ⅰ、附件Ⅱ中负面清单的具体内容,从限制措施的数量、格式规范、领域分布、违背的正面义务等方面对CPTPP成员国负面清单的特征进行分类总结,进而结合中国的负面清单实践,从加快转变跨境服务贸易管理思路、熟练运用两类负面清单的服务贸易管理模式以及负面清单领域设计更具科学性的角度提出建议。 The use of negative lists to manage cross-border service trade has become a global development trend. China will adopt a negative list in the China-South Korea FTA and the China-Australia FTA to manage cross-border trade in services. It is also inevitable that the negative list will be used for negotiation in bilateral and multilateral regional trade agreements in the future. CPTPP represents the high-level practice of global investment and trade rules. This article analyzes the content of the cross-border service trade part of CPTPP and the specific content of the negative lists of member states in Annex Ⅰ and Annex Ⅱ, from the number of restrictive measures, format specifications, and field distribution, Violation of positive obligations, classify and summarize the characteristics of the negative list of CPTPP member countries, and then combine with China’s negative list practice, from accelerating the transformation of cross-border service trade management thinking, accelerating the standardization of negative list format and design of the negative list field Make recommendations from a more scientific perspective.
作者 杨荣珍 陈雨
出处 《价格理论与实践》 北大核心 2020年第12期54-57,共4页 Price:Theory & Practice
基金 国家社科基金项目“特朗普执政后美国对华贸易摩擦的新形式与潜在政策工具研究”(18BGJ016)。
关键词 CPTPP 跨境服务贸易 负面清单 FTA CPTPP cross-border service trade negative list FTA
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献15

共引文献100

同被引文献94

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部