期刊文献+

论CISG中的卖方补救权

The Study on Seller's Right to Cure under the CISG
下载PDF
导出
摘要 作为平衡买卖双方当事人利益的重要机制,卖方补救权在CISG的违约救济体系中占有举足轻重的地位。卖方通过行使补救权,可以获得履行原合同并要求买方支付全额价款的二次机会。CISG中的卖方补救权由多款条文组成,按照不同的分类标准可以分为法定、意定补救权或者期前、期后补救权。卖方补救权的行使需要满足一定的要件,并将产生相应的法律效果。但由于CISG中原条款规定不甚周全,导致解释难度增加;同时卖方补救权与关联制度之间的关系也存在多种解释。厘清卖方补救权的行使要件,明析卖方补救权的分类及法律效果,可弥补法律规定之不足,促进公平交易。 As an important mechanism for CISG to balance the interests of both parties,the seller's right to cure plays an important role in CISG's remedy system for breach of contract.By exercising the right to cure,the seller can get a second chance to perform the original contract and ask the buyer to pay the full price.The seller's right of remedy in CISG is composed of several clauses.According to different classification standards,it can be divided into legal/voluntary cure right or pre/post cure right.The exercise of the seller's right to cure needs to meet certain constitutive requirements and will produce corresponding legal consequences.However,due to the incompleteness of the original provisions in CISG,the difficulty of interpretation has increased;at the same time,there are many views on the relationship between the seller's right to cure and the related system,which need to be further clarified.Therefore,it can make up the shortages and promote even bargain to clarify excise requirements of sellers'right to cure and clear the classification and legal effects.
作者 朱开磊 ZHU Kailei(Law school,City University of Macao,Macao,999078,China)
出处 《西安石油大学学报(社会科学版)》 2021年第4期81-87,共7页 Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University:Social Science Edition
关键词 卖方补救权 CISG 买卖合同救济 seller's right to cure CISG relief of sales contract
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献10

  • 1侯国跃.契约附随义务研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2008:116.
  • 2季卫东.关系契约论的启示[M]//麦克尼尔.新社会契约论--关于现代契约关系的探讨.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1994:1-10.
  • 3内田贵.契约法的现代化--展望21世纪的契约与契约法[M]//.梁慧星.民商法论丛:第6卷.北京:法律出版社,1997:312-329.
  • 4海因·克茨.欧洲合同法:上卷[M].北京:法律出版社,2001.
  • 5焦富民.中国合同责任制度研究[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2003:165-166.
  • 6卢谌.履行请求权及其界限[J].比较法研究,2007,21(4):98-104. 被引量:4
  • 7张玉卿.国际商事合同通则2004[M].北京:中国商务出版社,2005.255,481,481,572,503.
  • 8亨利·马瑟.合同法与道德[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2005.20.
  • 9E·博登海默.法理学--法律哲学与法律方法[M].邓正来,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004:277.
  • 10焦富民,陆一.协作理念与债务人治愈权的构造[J].扬州大学学报(人文社会科学版),2009,13(2):66-71. 被引量:4

共引文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部